Re: Informational vs Something-Else

Frank Kastenholz <kasten@ftp.com> Fri, 05 May 1995 20:45 UTC

Date: Fri, 05 May 1995 16:43:13 -0400
Message-Id: <9505052043.AA00021@mailserv-D.ftp.com>
To: klensin@mail1.reston.mci.net
Subject: Re: Informational vs Something-Else
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Frank Kastenholz <kasten@ftp.com>
Reply-To: kasten@ftp.com
Cc: mo@uunet.uu.net, iesg@CNRI.Reston.VA.US
Repository: mailserv-D.ftp.com, [message accepted at Fri May 5 16:43:06 1995]
Originating-Client: europa
Content-Length: 830

 > One observation: in parallel with the "end run in progress" and "Really Bad
 > Idea" categories for Informational, there are the "This is a Known Bad
 > Idea", "This 'experiment' has been attempted before and succeeded in
 > demonstrating that this is a lousy idea", and "There is already a Standard
 > in this area, this isn't it, and the authors offer no reason to believe that
 > their 'experiment' will offer any improvement" categories of Experimental.
 > Experimental should get the same treatment as Informational, with the new
 > class of RFC also being the alternative.

call them internet experiment notes


--
Frank Kastenholz    "The dogmas of the quiet past are inadequate to the stormy
                     present... As our case is new, so we must think anew, and
                     act anew" - A. Lincoln

Informational vs Something-Else Mike O'Dell
Re: Informational vs Something-Else kostick
Re: Informational vs Something-Else John C Klensin
Re: adding moderated and unmoderated to Experimen… Mike O'Dell
Re: Informational vs Something-Else Frank Kastenholz
Re: Informational vs Something-Else Frank Kastenholz