Re: Last Call: RPC: Remote Procedure Call Protocol Specification Version 2 to Proposed Standard
Allison Mankin <mankin@isi.edu> Thu, 04 May 1995 22:21 UTC
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa16690; 4 May 95 18:21 EDT
Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa16686; 4 May 95 18:21 EDT
Received: from ietf.cnri.reston.va.us by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa17899; 4 May 95 18:21 EDT
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa16678; 4 May 95 18:20 EDT
Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa16672; 4 May 95 18:20 EDT
Received: from zephyr.isi.edu by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa17889; 4 May 95 18:21 EDT
Received: from zephyr.isi.edu by zephyr.isi.edu (5.65c/5.61+local-17) id <AA14227>; Thu, 4 May 1995 15:21:43 -0700
Message-Id: <199505042221.AA14227@zephyr.isi.edu>
To: Steve Coya <scoya@CNRI.Reston.VA.US>
Cc: iesg@CNRI.Reston.VA.US
Reply-To: mankin@isi.edu
Subject: Re: Last Call: RPC: Remote Procedure Call Protocol Specification Version 2 to Proposed Standard
In-Reply-To: Your message of Thu, 04 May 1995 14:22:14 -0400. <9505041422.aa09526@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US>
Date: Thu, 04 May 1995 15:21:43 -0700
X-Orig-Sender: iesg-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Allison Mankin <mankin@isi.edu>
> IF/when the I-Ds are approved, you should make sure to point to the rfc > which has the sun/isoc agreement about these protocol specs > I would suggest including this in the Protocol writeup as well. Steve, But of course! Thanks for the reminder, though. Al
- Re: Last Call: RPC: Remote Procedure Call Protoco… Steve Coya
- Re: Last Call: RPC: Remote Procedure Call Protoco… Allison Mankin