Re: Last Call: RPC: Remote Procedure Call Protocol Specification Version 2 to Proposed Standard
Steve Coya <scoya@CNRI.Reston.VA.US> Thu, 04 May 1995 18:22 UTC
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa09553; 4 May 95 14:22 EDT
Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa09549; 4 May 95 14:22 EDT
Received: from ietf.cnri.reston.va.us by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa12419; 4 May 95 14:22 EDT
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa09538; 4 May 95 14:22 EDT
Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa09534; 4 May 95 14:22 EDT
Received: from ietf.cnri.reston.va.us by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa12409; 4 May 95 14:22 EDT
Received: from [127.0.0.1] by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa09526; 4 May 95 14:22 EDT
To: mankin@isi.edu
cc: iesg@CNRI.Reston.VA.US
Subject: Re: Last Call: RPC: Remote Procedure Call Protocol Specification Version 2 to Proposed Standard
In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 02 May 95 18:25:39 PDT." <199505030125.AA15329@zephyr.isi.edu>
Date: Thu, 04 May 1995 14:22:14 -0400
X-Orig-Sender: iesg-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Steve Coya <scoya@CNRI.Reston.VA.US>
Message-ID: <9505041422.aa09526@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US>
IF/when the I-Ds are approved, you should make sure to point to the rfc which has the sun/isoc agreement about these protocol specs I would suggest including this in the Protocol writeup as well. Steve
- Re: Last Call: RPC: Remote Procedure Call Protoco… Steve Coya
- Re: Last Call: RPC: Remote Procedure Call Protoco… Allison Mankin