Ballot: Connection-less Lightweight Directory Access Protocol to Proposed Standard

IESG Secretary <iesg-secretary@CNRI.Reston.VA.US> Fri, 05 May 1995 21:32 UTC

Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa12327; 5 May 95 17:32 EDT
Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa12321; 5 May 95 17:32 EDT
Received: from ietf.cnri.reston.va.us by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa16033; 5 May 95 17:32 EDT
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa12313; 5 May 95 17:32 EDT
Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa12309; 5 May 95 17:32 EDT
Received: from ietf.cnri.reston.va.us by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa16028; 5 May 95 17:32 EDT
Received: from [127.0.0.1] by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa12304; 5 May 95 17:32 EDT
To: Internet Engineering Steering Group <iesg@CNRI.Reston.VA.US>
X-Orig-Sender: iesg-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: IESG Secretary <iesg-secretary@CNRI.Reston.VA.US>
Reply-To: IESG Secretary <iesg-secretary@CNRI.Reston.VA.US>
Subject: Ballot: Connection-less Lightweight Directory Access Protocol to Proposed Standard
Date: Fri, 05 May 1995 17:32:38 -0400
X-Orig-Sender: scoya@CNRI.Reston.VA.US
Message-ID: <9505051732.aa12304@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US>

Last Call to expire on: 11/03/1994

	Please return the full line with the vote.

		    Yes    No-Objection  Discuss *  Abstain

Harald Alvestrand   [ X ]     [   ]       [   ]      [   ]
Scott Bradner       [   ]     [   ]       [   ]      [   ]
Joel Halpern        [   ]     [   ]       [   ]      [   ]
Frank Kastenholz    [   ]     [   ]       [   ]      [   ]
John Klensin        [   ]     [   ]       [   ]      [   ]
Deirdre Kostick     [   ]     [   ]       [   ]      [   ]
Allison Mankin      [   ]     [   ]       [   ]      [   ]
Paul Mockapetris    [   ]     [   ]       [   ]      [   ]
Mike O'Dell         [   ]     [   ]       [   ]      [   ]
Joyce K. Reynolds   [   ]     [   ]       [   ]      [   ]
Jeff Schiller       [   ]     [   ]       [   ]      [   ]
Susan Thomson       [   ]     [   ]       [   ]      [   ]

 Yes =>     I have read the spec and know it is good stuff.
 No Obj =>  I am familiar with the protocol and believe it to be OK.
	    Note: The ballot contains analysis from the AD which
		  may be adequate information to vote positively.
 Discuss => There is something fishy that may need clarification
	    or modification.  May be considered a "no" vote.
 Abstain => I am not familiar with the spec, have no
	    interest/expertise in the subject or otherwise feel
	    obliged to skip the voting.

 2/3 (8) Yes or No-Objection votes needed to pass.

 * Indicate reason if "Discuss".


To: IETF-Announce:;
Dcc: *******
Cc: RFC Editor <rfc-editor@isi.edu>
Cc: Internet Architecture Board <iab@isi.edu>
Cc: ietf-osi-ds@cs.ucl.ac.uk
From: IESG Secretary <iesg-secretary@cnri.reston.va.us>
Subject: Protocol Action: Connection-less Lightweight Directory Access
	 Protocol to Proposed Standard
-------------


The IESG has approved the Internet-Draft "Connection-less Lightweight
Directory Access Protocol" <draft-ietf-osids-cldap-02.txt> as a
Proposed Standard.  This work was initiated in the [now defunct] OSI
Directory Services Working Group and completed by the Access and
Synchronization of the Internet Directories Working Group. The IESG
contact person is Harald Tveit Alvestrand.



Technical Summary

  The protocol described in this document is designed to provide access
  to the Directory while not incurring the resource requirements of the
  Directory Access Protocol (DAP) as specified in X.500.  In particular,
  it is aimed at avoiding the elapsed time that is associated with
  connection-oriented communication and it facilitates use of the
  Directory in a manner analagous to the DNS.  It is specifically
  targeted at simple lookup applications that require to read a small
  number of attribute values from a single entry.  It is intended to be
  a complement to DAP and LDAP (RFC 1487).  The protocol specification
  draws heavily on that of LDAP (RFC 1487) that has proven to be the
  most widely used and implemented access protocol for X.500 to date.

  Advice on how to implement a retransmission strategy was added after
  the previous IESG review.

Working Group Summary

  Most of the debate on CLDAP focused on improvements to LDAP.  There
  was a clear concensus on the connectionless approach.

Protocol Quality

  The specification has been reviewed by a member of the Applications
  Area Directorate and by one of the Area Directors.