Re: [MSEC] Application layer multicast security protocol

"Sheela Rowles (sheela)" <sheela@cisco.com> Wed, 24 August 2011 14:09 UTC

Return-Path: <sheela@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: msec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: msec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4D2B21F86AA for <msec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Aug 2011 07:09:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-4.000, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RkwhHIs1uGHX for <msec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Aug 2011 07:09:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com [173.37.86.77]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B33121F8678 for <msec@ietf.org>; Wed, 24 Aug 2011 07:09:49 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=sheela@cisco.com; l=1184; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1314195060; x=1315404660; h=mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:subject:date: message-id:in-reply-to:references:from:to:cc; bh=eLe0AM8Qn3lx9tfXgmZ/h5gO2X88mmU5ftL8ZzkmpRY=; b=H8RF7ahKr6VQEEDaeOpUQr8EhbmWhxUs4oWNLpv61BNe/RxexaoNaiqz bz+bIyA++ZI8qGsjoV9hOMe6kFa+OBL+iZj+h2GsJQTmQQdDzrpIqM3D3 ifUD41ZXCfqE0jRYqMghYaVZIPPWazp4A4g7VtVWTGDIfE4clGc3DVBad 0=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ArYAABYGVU6rRDoG/2dsb2JhbABCmB6PWXeBQAEBAQEDAQEBDwEdCjQLDAQCAQgRBAEBAQoGFwEGASYfCQgBAQQBEggah1OcLAGfN4VqXwSHYZBOjAU
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.68,275,1312156800"; d="scan'208";a="16049543"
Received: from mtv-core-1.cisco.com ([171.68.58.6]) by rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com with ESMTP; 24 Aug 2011 14:10:43 +0000
Received: from xbh-sjc-221.amer.cisco.com (xbh-sjc-221.cisco.com [128.107.191.63]) by mtv-core-1.cisco.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p7OEAhKI009463; Wed, 24 Aug 2011 14:10:43 GMT
Received: from xmb-sjc-224.amer.cisco.com ([128.107.191.98]) by xbh-sjc-221.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Wed, 24 Aug 2011 07:10:43 -0700
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2011 07:10:40 -0700
Message-ID: <6B9C4B97B82F924485E26968EB05A6EE0D113659@xmb-sjc-224.amer.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <4E54A020.4020600@codelabs.ch>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
thread-topic: [MSEC] Application layer multicast security protocol
Thread-Index: AcxiKrLPEo/N42Q1TqGuzA6h3oSJ5wAPLVOg
References: <CAODMbr0VCDd+m+3VunK8HOx1r+cmncQubWQAH0hCweVMqrpOzg@mail.gmail.com> <4E54A020.4020600@codelabs.ch>
From: "Sheela Rowles (sheela)" <sheela@cisco.com>
To: Adrian-Ken Rueegsegger <ken@codelabs.ch>, sampreeth ramavana <sampreeth@gmail.com>, "Dan Wing (dwing)" <dwing@cisco.com>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 24 Aug 2011 14:10:43.0353 (UTC) FILETIME=[9C7D9090:01CC6267]
Cc: msec@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [MSEC] Application layer multicast security protocol
X-BeenThere: msec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multicast Security List <msec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/msec>, <mailto:msec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/msec>
List-Post: <mailto:msec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:msec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/msec>, <mailto:msec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2011 14:09:50 -0000

Added Dan Wing since the GDOI/SRTP draft was dropped because Dan Wing
had an alternative draft.  Sorry can't remember the details now.

Sheela

-----Original Message-----
From: msec-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:msec-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
Adrian-Ken Rueegsegger
Sent: Tuesday, August 23, 2011 11:54 PM
To: sampreeth ramavana
Cc: msec@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [MSEC] Application layer multicast security protocol

Hi Sampreeth,

On 08/24/2011 07:35 AM, sampreeth ramavana wrote:
> Hi All,
> 
> Is there any multicast security protocol that can be implemented in
> the application layer?
> 
> I was seeing the GDOI protocol was mainly talking about implementing
> using the IPSec at the IP layer. Can GDOI protocol also be useful if
> implemented at application layer.

GDOI can be extended to provide key material for other protocols. Mark,
Sheela and I wrote a draft (which has since expired) which specifies the
usage of GDOI with SRTP [1].

Regards,
Adrian

[1] - http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-msec-gdoi-srtp
_______________________________________________
MSEC mailing list
MSEC@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/msec