Re: [MSEC] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6407 (3598)
Brian Weis <bew@cisco.com> Wed, 01 May 2013 22:49 UTC
Return-Path: <bew@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: msec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: msec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26CFB21F9B55 for <msec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 May 2013 15:49:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -110.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HH80x0hv14vy for <msec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 May 2013 15:49:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mtv-iport-1.cisco.com (mtv-iport-1.cisco.com [173.36.130.12]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F83E21F9AE1 for <msec@ietf.org>; Wed, 1 May 2013 15:49:07 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2368; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1367448547; x=1368658147; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc: content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=sI6cWm+HD4mQ0bWCce282KV/40HcrXTjukYuAWTkAgk=; b=eqyjz81I+Tt2MyGw3pkLhTfK4i2LXe804o+Wm8SMpB3JFgoyTbQkqY18 Pywtr1+HpUtOqp0DxymJ1lvKS2+u9EkQFdysn+O0otN0VPrnLIXYjpwJ7 gPn8iLPQWlkBRsItYQb9pPkWqpTDQIn3g24hWfG+a4/rALUidzHXGrRyn g=;
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.87,591,1363132800"; d="scan'208";a="77019121"
Received: from mtv-core-2.cisco.com ([171.68.58.7]) by mtv-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 01 May 2013 22:49:05 +0000
Received: from dhcp-128-107-146-251.cisco.com (dhcp-128-107-146-251.cisco.com [128.107.146.251]) by mtv-core-2.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r41MmWtR029323 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Wed, 1 May 2013 22:49:04 GMT
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.3 \(1503\))
From: Brian Weis <bew@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <51819703.3050604@ieca.com>
Date: Wed, 01 May 2013 15:49:05 -0700
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <6E43D44B-59A0-4774-9FA2-F926E1CE45F2@cisco.com>
References: <20130420165520.C9F4AB1E003@rfc-editor.org> <51819703.3050604@ieca.com>
To: Sean Turner <turners@ieca.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1503)
Cc: msec@ietf.org, hardjono@mit.edu, stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie, claude.brieredelisle@wanadoo.fr
Subject: Re: [MSEC] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6407 (3598)
X-BeenThere: msec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multicast Security List <msec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/msec>, <mailto:msec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/msec>
List-Post: <mailto:msec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:msec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/msec>, <mailto:msec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 May 2013 22:49:21 -0000
Hi Sean, The errata author checked with me before submitting it. He is correct. Brian On May 1, 2013, at 3:28 PM, Sean Turner <turners@ieca.com> wrote: > Authors, > > Just to double check there's a Protocol field already there in the figure so this one needs to be verified right to remove the wrong field? > > spt > > On 4/20/13 10:55 AM, RFC Errata System wrote: >> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC6407, >> "The Group Domain of Interpretation". >> >> -------------------------------------- >> You may review the report below and at: >> http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=6407&eid=3598 >> >> -------------------------------------- >> Type: Editorial >> Reported by: Claude Briere de L'Isle <claude.brieredelisle@wanadoo.fr> >> >> Section: 5.5.1 >> >> Original Text >> ------------- >> DST ID Prot (1 octet) -- Value describing an IP protocol ID (e.g., >> >> UDP/TCP) [PROT-REG]. A value of zero means that the DST ID Prot >> >> field MUST be ignored. >> >> Corrected Text >> -------------- >> To be removed, this field does not exist >> >> Notes >> ----- >> M. Brian Weiss confirmed to me that "The description of "DST ID Prot (1 octet) on Page 32 is incorrect, no such field is meant to be in Figure 8. This is definitely errata. The bullet describing "DST ID Prot (1 octet)" should be removed" >> >> Instructions: >> ------------- >> This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please >> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or >> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG) >> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. >> >> -------------------------------------- >> RFC6407 (draft-ietf-msec-gdoi-update-11) >> -------------------------------------- >> Title : The Group Domain of Interpretation >> Publication Date : October 2011 >> Author(s) : B. Weis, S. Rowles, T. Hardjono >> Category : PROPOSED STANDARD >> Source : Multicast Security >> Area : Security >> Stream : IETF >> Verifying Party : IESG >> -- Brian Weis Security Engineering, SRG, Cisco Systems Telephone: +1 408 526 4796 Email: bew@cisco.com
- [MSEC] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6407 (3598) RFC Errata System
- Re: [MSEC] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6407 (3… Sean Turner
- Re: [MSEC] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6407 (3… Brian Weis