Subject: Re: [Mtgvenue] About draft-ietf-mtgvenue-iaoc-venue-selection-process
From: Eliot Lear <[email-masked]>
To: Brian E Carpenter <[email-masked]>, Lou Berger <[email-masked]>, [email-masked]
Cc: Alissa Cooper <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2018 08:53:50 +0200
List-Id: "List for email discussion of the IAOC meeting venue selection process." <mtgvenue.ietf.org>

I have received one response to this in public, and several in private,
all preferring referencing of the LLC.  Last call, please.  Especially
those who prefer retaining IASA.

On 18.10.18 10:31, Eliot Lear wrote:
>
>
>
> On 17.10.18 21:48, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
>> 1) The effort is called IASA 2 for a reason. IASA 1 was based on the
>> IAD+IAOC structure. IASA 2 is based on the LLC structure. Who knows
>> what IASA 3 will be based on? I see no problem with using IASA as
>> the umbrella term.
>
> Two questions – for everyone:
>
>  1. Do you believe referencing the struct draft and using IASA is
>     easier or harder for the reader?
>  2. Should we block on the struct draft?
>  3. Could we reference the LLC page informationally and use the LLC?
>
>
> Eliot
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mtgvenue mailing list
> [email-masked]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mtgvenue