[Mtgvenue] Spencer Dawkins' Yes on draft-ietf-mtgvenue-iaoc-venue-selection-process-15: (with COMMENT)
Spencer Dawkins <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com> Tue, 05 June 2018 21:51 UTC
Return-Path: <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mtgvenue@ietf.org
Delivered-To: mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E80B130DE1; Tue, 5 Jun 2018 14:51:05 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Spencer Dawkins <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-mtgvenue-iaoc-venue-selection-process@ietf.org, mtgvenue-chairs@ietf.org, presnick@qti.qualcomm.com, mtgvenue@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.81.1
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <152823546557.19203.3421488213161217390.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2018 14:51:05 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mtgvenue/1yv6qmuu-ejeMnP_X0yUeUiv15I>
Subject: [Mtgvenue] Spencer Dawkins' Yes on draft-ietf-mtgvenue-iaoc-venue-selection-process-15: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: mtgvenue@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26
List-Id: "List for email discussion of the IAOC meeting venue selection process." <mtgvenue.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mtgvenue>, <mailto:mtgvenue-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mtgvenue/>
List-Post: <mailto:mtgvenue@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mtgvenue-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mtgvenue>, <mailto:mtgvenue-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2018 21:51:06 -0000
Spencer Dawkins has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-mtgvenue-iaoc-venue-selection-process-15: Yes When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mtgvenue-iaoc-venue-selection-process/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- I like where the exchange on Martin's comment has ended up. Thanks for that. Everything following my first comment is editorial (at most). Given that we have an active effort to produce IASA 2.0, is As always, the community is encouraged to provide direct feedback to the Nominations Committee (NOMCOM), Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG), and IAB regarding the discharge of the IASA's performance. going to age well? I think Focus: We meet to have focused technical discussions. These are not limited to scheduled breakout sessions, although of course those are important. They also happen over meals or drinks -- including a specific type of non-session that we call a "Bar BOF" [RFC6771] - or in side meetings. should have the reference at the end of the sentence, as in Focus: We meet to have focused technical discussions. These are not limited to scheduled breakout sessions, although of course those are important. They also happen over meals or drinks -- including a specific type of non-session that we call a "Bar BOF" or side meeting [RFC6771]. [RFC6771] uses both terms interchangeably. Not asking for a text change on this, but I wonder when the last meeting was o The Facility's support technologies and services -- network, audio-video, etc. -- are sufficient for the anticipated activities at the meeting, or the Facility is willing to add such infrastructure or these support technologies and services might be provided by a third party, all at no -- or at an acceptable -- cost to the IETF. where the Facility provided these things at no cost to the IETF ... I wonder if "something of a preference for" is easy for ESL folk. o We have something of a preference for an IETF meeting to be under "One Roof". That is, qualified meeting space and guest rooms are available in the same facility. I note that the following bullets are all "it is desirable". This is a side question for the AD, but I note that we've started including long-lived URLs in RFCs, and I wonder if a URL could be selected to include in this text: 4. Documentation Requirements The IETF Community works best when it is well informed. This memo does not specify processes nor who has responsibility for fulfilling our requirements for meetings. Nevertheless, both of these aspects are important. Therefore, the IASA SHALL publicly document and keep current both a list of roles and responsibilities relating to IETF meetings, as well as the selection processes they use in order to fulfill the requirements of the community. ISTM that people would click on it more often if they didn't have to search for it ...
- Re: [Mtgvenue] Spencer Dawkins' Yes on draft-ietf… Spencer Dawkins at IETF
- Re: [Mtgvenue] Spencer Dawkins' Yes on draft-ietf… Pete Resnick
- [Mtgvenue] Spencer Dawkins' Yes on draft-ietf-mtg… Spencer Dawkins