IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Mtgvenue] Issue #24: More than 1 hq hotel?

Fred Baker <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com> Mon, 15 May 2017 18:02 UTC

Return-Path: <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1C8312441E for <mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 May 2017 11:02:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jQh8IQKUqNzd for <mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 May 2017 11:02:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pg0-x241.google.com (mail-pg0-x241.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c05::241]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 374CB128BBB for <mtgvenue@ietf.org>; Mon, 15 May 2017 10:59:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pg0-x241.google.com with SMTP id h64so13066998pge.3 for <mtgvenue@ietf.org>; Mon, 15 May 2017 10:59:35 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=xOJMWXkSNNURoc2f4wl/B6aA+Q+rm/bXcgvAOWqrpGg=; b=UPzxCoUn2Zp8GdZDg0M5534K3Rd0NYPNsxDZD0Q2STnoex69zclxZEPRESa+VZnzPP 0kNhAfo6cJjPF7SzHAQsE7q/wrna5Yny57KCBl1NNUneYpbFgf8HdBd/Q7Gf2oJ4egCf X2xIXeINNri96EHNWh1Rfd7KgYHVd4CIoFrhct6sjRvFps4l6QwkTCWReifm9ZjcOEYf TwU/OuZBDHqb4IwfhJHu4k4qQiXt+mRQgVyRwRi7aOsNFuTLxbmoqPKqdeWMaWcCxjsZ eeKu6Nfw+nELbCCbFc+27izTnk6T007NyAguC5+HG/viEsgkOt+pw0Jsh/oqDdAvvCJW G54w==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=xOJMWXkSNNURoc2f4wl/B6aA+Q+rm/bXcgvAOWqrpGg=; b=AflHn+MDF4ix4HYvfs44hygqbjRReoB9vxYyP1Do7dP32NBSwdUYY+oLOvbxegwj2M r23RwG4quHjDSc7iWn+QPXDL/i6HZXCuJ/UB085TkgNSzePWKgEE5EdtrqlKBziUhpDD igeQCeM8Xtoe/inOOW8gHvYNvDkAp6SB6i3YsMfimXCwFQr9+NhyFOyfXIIjLtVGrqps 40gjs8dvT2uy8oFPG7hp6/J2DhQyl/0E5OiHxcIIbxi0uMUAm05oPcsVjp3D3BYkdLgN pN63bi8mDdZ8XjUeKWGtJiOqYi9MxLVpgv9mzWM2xRkfXIbrBIdENoJ068XDKGlffbTO qyWQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AODbwcBIhkreHVRQbCsKhjDLdqRsYhZJ0vuTxQK0w/nKe5EhKpjW4S6f CMU6ktqCQ4wfFQ==
X-Received: by 10.99.148.17 with SMTP id m17mr7549403pge.187.1494871174866; Mon, 15 May 2017 10:59:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.12] (wsip-184-191-158-59.sd.sd.cox.net. [184.191.158.59]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id k192sm21955525pgc.31.2017.05.15.10.59.33 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 15 May 2017 10:59:33 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\))
From: Fred Baker <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <FE8CC603-041E-4823-BC53-9DB1F627E7C4@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 15 May 2017 10:59:32 -0700
Cc: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>, "mtgvenue@ietf.org" <mtgvenue@ietf.org>, Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <6FEFDDA9-3FA8-4FE2-A033-0F9B7141D004@gmail.com>
References: <9a41874c-24e2-aa0c-e58c-7bee8b35f91b@cisco.com> <2247.1494795324@obiwan.sandelman.ca> <e83d3fe9-4394-b82a-0a75-008329ef62a8@cisco.com> <8359.1494857281@obiwan.sandelman.ca> <8e365c06-99e5-e9f1-50d1-2e3558400248@cisco.com> <FE8CC603-041E-4823-BC53-9DB1F627E7C4@gmail.com>
To: Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mtgvenue/2gVsErdcd8oXf9n9uzMOVn2AR-M>
Subject: Re: [Mtgvenue] Issue #24: More than 1 hq hotel?
X-BeenThere: mtgvenue@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "List for email discussion of the IAOC meeting venue selection process." <mtgvenue.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mtgvenue>, <mailto:mtgvenue-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mtgvenue/>
List-Post: <mailto:mtgvenue@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mtgvenue-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mtgvenue>, <mailto:mtgvenue-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 May 2017 18:02:44 -0000

> On May 15, 2017, at 9:14 AM, Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> To me this thread has moved from a requirement to how it should be implemented.  Isn’t the requirement that we want a lounge? 

Even that sounds like implementation. From an "it's four years in advance and we want to know whether this is a reasonable city to visit and hotel to maybe contract with" perspective, the requirement is that there is a room we could use as a lounge if we choose to.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email