Re: [Mtgvenue] I-D Action: draft-ietf-mtgvenue-iaoc-venue-selection-process-14.txt

Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Wed, 09 May 2018 20:51 UTC

Return-Path: <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Original-To: mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FD5F12DA6C for <mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 May 2018 13:51:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.61
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.61 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ikGzhxO6GOzI for <mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 May 2018 13:51:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io0-x22b.google.com (mail-io0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c06::22b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A584212D95B for <mtgvenue@ietf.org>; Wed, 9 May 2018 13:51:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io0-x22b.google.com with SMTP id z4-v6so546303iof.5 for <mtgvenue@ietf.org>; Wed, 09 May 2018 13:51:10 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=WE2GCQAGPZdgVMpkWMiOL3V/TvhJ5olLGovhHC9eKHU=; b=Iwe4jK7eOBCwPc2XIst1SbY/fzCCOWlX5Q+JZAwpE8dH9Ngy476LR63/QkaXJK4IvN RWlSqqHxwi1LXKVQT2xHBs8eISuVzOxU/YYzbGuDZC7NX7yjIyj3Ib+axkoVIxMfS2L+ 4vCxrJYfUCJmOXc/HB0CPBkQjmNyWm3hsPvrGJYgJnU/EB2I3zxU44F6BhO6d/4rDDwU PEI5//rk0N9rng8iiZtL+1zWzXQKzzWz6OwnSWZf18oJBAa7G0Ef4CuZ4uLGc5ACWHlB PnCwPmeZ9cPqHAGyloJAq7sEYiv9Bi/MzXzDjTwzBa8Fo4VpAMwshQmpGuH8+oytgP9V Jx0g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=WE2GCQAGPZdgVMpkWMiOL3V/TvhJ5olLGovhHC9eKHU=; b=V8B9Hlrmd4gxNJBTpyOEr451uVBjq7wszgrs1Xe11MzgkdsXD/hW1lsu/QlsW/Xo20 uKsdCSkVFnNhACvZkK3S43F88PRd0JbDxRT2wv6crz6xgKZS3Ool/zxmAgSNSlBg0NN2 Z7lSMFoQVENLMkloCwZ+tYH5FkzlZweUFsC4c5KJuC3qJCqntnCH2AvAX3/uXSsq+kyC p0TxtPehuoRdGqAsJ/BiYhDO4duqJCOupkbXpA83by2czgKyx24TjffDNC3QAP6W3OAD TTMjhMliCSzZ1N/HbTC4Lm/iZ/YutuPymirZmPjd/jB8zHrmjGQLwS+d7kFWES2xCMRA Yo7Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALQs6tCxqOO213WlY/zz0+UFh7JoCPZNoKLIG+CeJNNVSt9l++Qf29Fh qUEzMEGogDccsCwjuhT5XtTobdgMuzw6cf6BLMJwZw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AB8JxZo5xYhu4NJuqJJX53CPfiSn9PdNYgqf0cGkAHRMYBb9UYuohJirOMK/h4hZvXmH0aq9+YTjlOHhntye4wRkwBs=
X-Received: by 2002:a6b:3454:: with SMTP id b81-v6mr50282785ioa.115.1525899069779; Wed, 09 May 2018 13:51:09 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <152584638193.2839.7801870228413280951@ietfa.amsl.com> <c30fd21a-85ee-734c-771c-00ff65490acb@cisco.com> <CABmDk8=HKLR89dvDTuO4eguPE5LCV-YPmcbBr1WdUuFNi+NsBw@mail.gmail.com> <C636B337-D0C8-44C1-AED9-A117B6DB1BA6@fugue.com> <20180509201108.GD9500@mx4.yitter.info> <C28D7966-F7D7-488D-A2DE-705209665DD4@fugue.com> <20180509203640.GE9500@mx4.yitter.info>
In-Reply-To: <20180509203640.GE9500@mx4.yitter.info>
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Date: Wed, 09 May 2018 20:50:58 +0000
Message-ID: <CAPt1N1ntq8=xnKfa9G9u-SSkAQ8aT1US9FUH3H658RhgGoZYNg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>
Cc: mtgvenue <mtgvenue@ietf.org>, ietf <ietf@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000000485fa056bcc1067"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mtgvenue/6fXgj8qCsaeUmSRGh-FgBZOK7XA>
Subject: Re: [Mtgvenue] I-D Action: draft-ietf-mtgvenue-iaoc-venue-selection-process-14.txt
X-BeenThere: mtgvenue@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "List for email discussion of the IAOC meeting venue selection process." <mtgvenue.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mtgvenue>, <mailto:mtgvenue-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mtgvenue/>
List-Post: <mailto:mtgvenue@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mtgvenue-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mtgvenue>, <mailto:mtgvenue-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 May 2018 20:51:13 -0000

I don't know if the document should be explicit about this, but certainly
if it is not common practice to spot check the venue hotel, that's a recipe
for bad outcomes.

On Wed, May 9, 2018, 16:37 Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com> wrote:

> On Wed, May 09, 2018 at 04:20:46PM -0400, Ted Lemon wrote:
> >
> > I think moulds are fine, but we want to avoid mold.
>
> Sorry, we use different spelling dictionaries.
>
> > was in Hiroshima, asking "are the rooms nonsmoking" didn't work either.
>  In
> > both cases, the site evaluation process requires that someone actually
> go look
> > at a bunch of rooms in the venue hotel and check to see that there isn't
> a
> > problem, without first telling the hotel staff specifically what we are
> looking
> > for, so that they don't know which rooms to steer us toward.
>
> That is not how I interpret the language in the draft that has been
> produced, so if it's what you're expecting I think it needs to be
> clear.  I think your restated requirement is that the staff performing
> the site vetting not only has checked for the relevant prohibitions
> and designations, but also that the prohibitions and designations are
> in fact enforced.  We do not have that language right now, in my
> reading.
>
> Best regards,
>
> A
>
> --
> Andrew Sullivan
> ajs@anvilwalrusden.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mtgvenue mailing list
> Mtgvenue@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mtgvenue
>