Re: [Mtgvenue] Ben Campbell's Yes on draft-ietf-mtgvenue-iaoc-venue-selection-process-15: (with COMMENT)

Pete Resnick <presnick@qti.qualcomm.com> Wed, 06 June 2018 21:59 UTC

Return-Path: <presnick@qti.qualcomm.com>
X-Original-To: mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9169130FB4; Wed, 6 Jun 2018 14:59:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.701
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.701 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=qti.qualcomm.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Nlrs3nfm8ajP; Wed, 6 Jun 2018 14:59:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alexa-out-sd-02.qualcomm.com (alexa-out-sd-02.qualcomm.com [199.106.114.39]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 63ED5130DF0; Wed, 6 Jun 2018 14:59:48 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=qti.qualcomm.com; i=@qti.qualcomm.com; q=dns/txt; s=qcdkim; t=1528322388; x=1559858388; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to: references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=FZQKsJjXl+dubHybIWdaBlo7fzyIbgNm/TN7AcDHa9A=; b=k3ZTK1wsISXoesgx7cb3kfUSnXadHD6kPlb71f2UABhkP0jz/BXDP5Nr u+Jr4GlF+t+o+TvkdokqLoWMRG1TAlc7jZzqcoHtzR3SkjozbAGDn8XuP +XmZq8IspGzL+ZmnymKAoXZ8avNtkvqFMK/d5IrtsOL81o2ayANU2Z0yc g=;
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.49,484,1520924400"; d="scan'208";a="4311275"
Received: from unknown (HELO ironmsg01-sd.qualcomm.com) ([10.53.140.141]) by alexa-out-sd-02.qualcomm.com with ESMTP; 06 Jun 2018 14:59:48 -0700
Received: from nasanexm01f.na.qualcomm.com ([10.85.0.32]) by ironmsg01-sd.qualcomm.com with ESMTP/TLS/AES256-SHA; 06 Jun 2018 14:59:47 -0700
Received: from [10.38.247.241] (10.80.80.8) by NASANEXM01F.na.qualcomm.com (10.85.0.32) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1365.1; Wed, 6 Jun 2018 14:59:47 -0700
From: Pete Resnick <presnick@qti.qualcomm.com>
To: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>
CC: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, <draft-ietf-mtgvenue-iaoc-venue-selection-process@ietf.org>, <mtgvenue-chairs@ietf.org>, <mtgvenue@ietf.org>
Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2018 16:59:45 -0500
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.11.2r5479)
Message-ID: <48022095-180B-4F01-AFDA-027D4AE673E4@qti.qualcomm.com>
In-Reply-To: <152831160427.6203.1032347954466946223.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
References: <152831160427.6203.1032347954466946223.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Originating-IP: [10.80.80.8]
X-ClientProxiedBy: NASANEXM01B.na.qualcomm.com (10.85.0.82) To NASANEXM01F.na.qualcomm.com (10.85.0.32)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mtgvenue/7PZR4wvNviwGKI86oh5EQVcABWA>
Subject: Re: [Mtgvenue] Ben Campbell's Yes on draft-ietf-mtgvenue-iaoc-venue-selection-process-15: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: mtgvenue@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26
Precedence: list
List-Id: "List for email discussion of the IAOC meeting venue selection process." <mtgvenue.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mtgvenue>, <mailto:mtgvenue-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mtgvenue/>
List-Post: <mailto:mtgvenue@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mtgvenue-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mtgvenue>, <mailto:mtgvenue-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Jun 2018 21:59:51 -0000

Hi Ben,

I think the 3.2.3/3.3 mismatch is strictly editorial: I believe the 
intent was to have them both use the 3.2.3 language.

Other editorial points noted. Thanks.

pr

On 6 Jun 2018, at 14:00, Ben Campbell wrote:

> Ben Campbell has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-mtgvenue-iaoc-venue-selection-process-15: Yes
>
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut 
> this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
>
>
> Please refer to 
> https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
>
>
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mtgvenue-iaoc-venue-selection-process/
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Thanks for this. Most of my comments are already covered, but here's a 
> few:
>
> Substantive:
>
> §3.2.3 and §3.3: The first section says that the cost of "open and 
> unfiltered
> internet" in public spaces and guest rooms in "typically" included in 
> the room
> price. But the latter simply says they are included.  Is that the 
> intenti? It
> seems odd for the overflow hotels to be held to a higher standard than 
> the
> meeting hotel.
>
> Editorial and Nits:
>
> §1, 2nd paragraph: " the IASA to apply their " - Plural disagreement. 
> (It looks
> like a mix of the US English tendency to treat organizations as 
> singular
> entities and the British English tendency to treat them as plural 
> collectives ).
>
> §7: The last sentence seems disconnected from the rest of the 
> paragraph; I
> suggest a separate paragraph.