IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Mtgvenue] Selection *process and policy* discussion please (Was: visa situation... worsens?)

Pete Resnick <presnick@qti.qualcomm.com> Sat, 25 March 2017 15:40 UTC

Return-Path: <presnick@qti.qualcomm.com>
X-Original-To: mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58035126C26 for <mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 25 Mar 2017 08:40:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.021
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.021 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=qti.qualcomm.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id u4dOCX6Mqr7M for <mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 25 Mar 2017 08:40:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from wolverine02.qualcomm.com (wolverine02.qualcomm.com [199.106.114.251]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A840E124BFA for <mtgvenue@ietf.org>; Sat, 25 Mar 2017 08:40:44 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=qti.qualcomm.com; i=@qti.qualcomm.com; q=dns/txt; s=qcdkim; t=1490456444; x=1521992444; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references: mime-version; bh=hig6i80Z7nk+BhQkDM1grdLMssVlEjDzm3fpg0keShY=; b=NnNQgUVKSfr5zh7NRd7d7cdf1gyXR2vpG+wZ8tKcgadpvepB7iKXjRBV wU83Njwm8Bx51e7KyaoGgbvwyUVAuNzAwjnGq5pRNaDVRFqH3bcSomGC1 uwGpLgFmBcxxJk+JnSOCj9bhQXcvV5DrhELE5JqzE8gp4m+7PexcHW48F E=;
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.36,220,1486454400"; d="scan'208";a="368092799"
Received: from unknown (HELO ironmsg02-L.qualcomm.com) ([10.53.140.109]) by wolverine02.qualcomm.com with ESMTP; 25 Mar 2017 08:40:43 -0700
X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="5800,7501,8478"; a="892320734"
X-MGA-submission: MDGjhyqRSRzmY3syDjA1GV7jEi+ey9SrUankpVXOPFj5jHagrhDHwBnYc+qfZ4G4lohxHEZO/YzZ2xyjkrT8/hjXyk2IjQCh6epA6N8Nphw2DiYuVdG7+K9e4DD0jU55mbyYPHK8N14mxFq8d35Voj9G
Received: from nasanexm01f.na.qualcomm.com ([10.85.0.32]) by ironmsg02-L.qualcomm.com with ESMTP/TLS/RC4-SHA; 25 Mar 2017 08:40:43 -0700
Received: from [10.64.104.25] (10.80.80.8) by NASANEXM01F.na.qualcomm.com (10.85.0.32) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1178.4; Sat, 25 Mar 2017 08:40:43 -0700
From: Pete Resnick <presnick@qti.qualcomm.com>
To: mtgvenue <mtgvenue@ietf.org>
Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2017 10:40:42 -0500
Message-ID: <1D19FEF3-D2B7-4982-810E-387EF1AFBC1D@qti.qualcomm.com>
In-Reply-To: <2805.1490212930@obiwan.sandelman.ca>
References: <2805.1490212930@obiwan.sandelman.ca>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format="flowed"
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.9.6r5347)
X-Originating-IP: [10.80.80.8]
X-ClientProxiedBy: NASANEXM01E.na.qualcomm.com (10.85.0.31) To NASANEXM01F.na.qualcomm.com (10.85.0.32)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mtgvenue/Go6aicRdCkVqatpboDnUTttp6O4>
Subject: [Mtgvenue] Selection *process and policy* discussion please (Was: visa situation... worsens?)
X-BeenThere: mtgvenue@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "List for email discussion of the IAOC meeting venue selection process." <mtgvenue.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mtgvenue>, <mailto:mtgvenue-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mtgvenue/>
List-Post: <mailto:mtgvenue@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mtgvenue-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mtgvenue>, <mailto:mtgvenue-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2017 15:40:46 -0000

Folks,

As interesting as this discussion is, it's not really giving much input 
into the charter items of this WG. Insofar as this informs what kinds of 
processes and policies should go into our documents, that's fine, but 
please frame the discussion that way. If you want to have a discussion 
about the particulars of the current US (or other national) policies and 
how they affect the selection of a particular venue, you should probably 
take that to venue-selection@ietf.org.

pr
-- 
Pete Resnick <http://www.qualcomm.com/~presnick/>
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. - +1 (858)651-4478

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email