Re: [Mtgvenue] comments on draft-ietf-mtgvenue-iaoc-venue-selection-process-04

Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net> Mon, 30 January 2017 12:33 UTC

Return-Path: <lberger@labn.net>
X-Original-To: mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F93A129462 for <mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Jan 2017 04:33:25 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.847
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.847 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-1.156, RCVD_IN_RP_RNBL=1.31, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (768-bit key) header.d=labn.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1DHyjgUXt7qZ for <mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Jan 2017 04:33:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from gproxy3-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com (gproxy3-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com [69.89.30.42]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 3552612945B for <mtgvenue@ietf.org>; Mon, 30 Jan 2017 04:33:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 9958 invoked by uid 0); 30 Jan 2017 12:33:22 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO cmgw4) (10.0.90.85) by gproxy3.mail.unifiedlayer.com with SMTP; 30 Jan 2017 12:33:22 -0000
Received: from box313.bluehost.com ([69.89.31.113]) by cmgw4 with id ecYJ1u0022SSUrH01cYMSG; Mon, 30 Jan 2017 05:32:21 -0700
X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.1 cv=JsBi8qIC c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=h1BC+oY+fLhyFmnTBx92Jg==:117 a=h1BC+oY+fLhyFmnTBx92Jg==:17 a=L9H7d07YOLsA:10 a=9cW_t1CCXrUA:10 a=s5jvgZ67dGcA:10 a=N659UExz7-8A:10 a=xqWC_Br6kY4A:10 a=IgFoBzBjUZAA:10 a=dA_KfiOiHo8bBkf9Ht4A:9 a=7Zwj6sZBwVKJAoWSPKxL6X1jA+E=:19 a=pILNOxqGKmIA:10
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=labn.net; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version :Date:Message-ID:From:References:To:Subject:Sender:Reply-To:Cc:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=xYAlVEkyeXxbNoah6Mo5xqvvA+3ZKLgBSQEybuHsCR4=; b=S8bd7u4FQvhukuL1T6IeO8C9AQ BbQTuxPVJ09LTbr4FWDH1oMxBb2+H8/GK+ggYLhJ7xUHDsbfKVRIRhBvSXh/RXMNL4d4VwRXY3hrK HGFK/MHw32AtxvGvdgpm+AqA4;
Received: from pool-100-15-85-191.washdc.fios.verizon.net ([100.15.85.191]:37916 helo=[IPv6:::1]) by box313.bluehost.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from <lberger@labn.net>) id 1cYB85-0000x2-T5; Mon, 30 Jan 2017 05:32:17 -0700
To: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>, mtgvenue@ietf.org
References: <9139334c-9c5e-814d-4299-c6f5950039b8@cs.tcd.ie>
From: Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>
Message-ID: <f9b2a33d-db49-54a0-a657-be58a08ff021@labn.net>
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2017 07:32:13 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <9139334c-9c5e-814d-4299-c6f5950039b8@cs.tcd.ie>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - box313.bluehost.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - labn.net
X-BWhitelist: no
X-Source-IP: 100.15.85.191
X-Exim-ID: 1cYB85-0000x2-T5
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:
X-Source-Sender: pool-100-15-85-191.washdc.fios.verizon.net ([IPv6:::1]) [100.15.85.191]:37916
X-Source-Auth: lberger@labn.net
X-Email-Count: 2
X-Source-Cap: bGFibm1vYmk7bGFibm1vYmk7Ym94MzEzLmJsdWVob3N0LmNvbQ==
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mtgvenue/IfHO7kw0dCmor7CRwia8JWeMFGM>
Subject: Re: [Mtgvenue] comments on draft-ietf-mtgvenue-iaoc-venue-selection-process-04
X-BeenThere: mtgvenue@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "List for email discussion of the IAOC meeting venue selection process." <mtgvenue.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mtgvenue>, <mailto:mtgvenue-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mtgvenue/>
List-Post: <mailto:mtgvenue@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mtgvenue-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mtgvenue>, <mailto:mtgvenue-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2017 12:33:25 -0000

Stephen,

    Just focusing in on comments to section 5 (as I suspect the other
comments will receive sufficient attention by others):


On 1/29/2017 11:10 PM, Stephen Farrell wrote:
> - section 5: this overall seems too prescriptive to me.  Do
> we really think we'll need to follow this process *exactly*
> in say 2027? I'd say making this all less prescriptive
> would be better.

I disagree -- Given the importance, visibility, impact, divisiveness,
etc of venue selection I think exactly this level of detail needs to be
agreed to by the community.  I do see your point that this section is
likely to need to be revisited more frequently than the rest of the
document and would support publishing it in its own document.  In fact
this section has been pretty stable and is probably ready for LC so such
a document could be rapidly split out and published.

> - 5.3 & 5.5: the links aren't a good idea (and are access
> controlled which is unacceptable if not fixed).

Agreed this material can either be incorporated as an appendix.  Given
the current evolving situation the flow chart on contingency planning is
good info to have available to the community...

Lou