Re: [Mtgvenue] Disposition of the group

Fred Baker <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com> Wed, 11 March 2020 00:04 UTC

Return-Path: <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 729A23A0A59 for <mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 17:04:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JgFEqo7omT40 for <mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 17:04:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wr1-x435.google.com (mail-wr1-x435.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::435]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D69D83A0A2F for <mtgvenue@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 17:04:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wr1-x435.google.com with SMTP id v9so268557wrf.10 for <mtgvenue@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 17:04:16 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=SJ9U+WUucDCXtiWHRHeePRkNBYiezxh/rOSXsWAcDhg=; b=l7eXdO8q5Ik551XiyjGXuev9gpqh6JDSNyc20ryXgVscQtDxzQRXoyqqYJ2VOQDLtE lQKBvGPvzKnNXyklRjaxSJSy5IWZD3ym8YnJzszX3ysbFsrgpGt0pRGJ8+vW6mwzUB7R lbU4RtpB3VZrlE3HSjMF7KsWhyhSMUEJxsDAgj0XTTPzbsEXqUwecXmff26twNoi7M8f lbpCT/G8/1YsH6yl4R5nWeeCWwRew70SAVftGQ8eDhj0sfjA93qssT7pvLsIyd7QVttw +fy+ZIWd1fgKtCK5Btzz/6g1Y6sSw1dI3nG775D/Xir8TaIx2Hdxs4gO75w0xt5s7fvG 3CoQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=SJ9U+WUucDCXtiWHRHeePRkNBYiezxh/rOSXsWAcDhg=; b=LxxyiTlc068JnTrsYDU1K14Lxk4Mp7G/B5WKJuE5o6V/oDl8+4NwS6ZtFi9n2O7RdP gTXG27Isck7DssOE+9WQHhlz4Uuj7XPSo4KxwTw+XbsNa6q311w+u8XoLpNRwpIelqfE UHw8K7wrJ9jk/d0DNVnGn5ZvBb609xFXRAGk0Io+ZSkHcfhOdhmjed3GCeMNoNYdtN8T CzRH/3pePBgf1JeBUBPXrvAqqdzLrH/MTwlbYSteEfeFnHaSGCY6T4ejpAIICSYcxF9R 4O82gxE5hS1wtV+Wg9vjgbLnM3DErkOydaHcVNOGYf+ScTdnHItXiCW6c7hW6OSnOVqo 26og==
X-Gm-Message-State: ANhLgQ3TvU9bxZCY22bhknwvoHKkS27mP5oQFJYB32gvlKVKc0iXrnzm hX8yAOhJeBBVWVuvbBdgIy051SiH
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vvwX6ep3fzECkn3BSFVm5UOxD19FRVx81L9NJ8slrge2XH5D7btPxT7F/89q2zTWbIU9ODfBw==
X-Received: by 2002:adf:e487:: with SMTP id i7mr388986wrm.151.1583885054667; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 17:04:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2600:8802:5900:13c4::1033? ([2600:8802:5900:13c4::1033]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id s22sm5616755wmc.16.2020.03.10.17.04.12 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 10 Mar 2020 17:04:13 -0700 (PDT)
From: Fred Baker <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <C8F4CCD2-729D-4FAA-9AC9-918732C22D58@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_D12C58D7-A1EB-4633-9CF1-FA502A41B789"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.80.23.2.1\))
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2020 17:04:10 -0700
In-Reply-To: <9B937623-5E7C-4BF1-AC9B-9CFFD5C33F93@cooperw.in>
Cc: mtgvenue@ietf.org
To: Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>
References: <9B937623-5E7C-4BF1-AC9B-9CFFD5C33F93@cooperw.in>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.80.23.2.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mtgvenue/JB7-z1QGygOdUOQo6Qt0KxUtwFo>
Subject: Re: [Mtgvenue] Disposition of the group
X-BeenThere: mtgvenue@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "List for email discussion of the IAOC meeting venue selection process." <mtgvenue.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mtgvenue>, <mailto:mtgvenue-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mtgvenue/>
List-Post: <mailto:mtgvenue@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mtgvenue-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mtgvenue>, <mailto:mtgvenue-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2020 00:04:24 -0000

Leaving the mailing list open is a common approach to this. If there is need to do more, it usually comes up after we have experience. I would suggest, and I think I'm conjuring with you in suggesting, that we recharter down the road if and when there is need.

> On Mar 5, 2020, at 11:01 AM, Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in> wrote:
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> The two deliverables for this group have been published: RFC 8718 and RFC 8719. Thanks to everyone who contributed.
> 
> At this point we could close the group. If we do that, I think we should keep the mailing list open. Or we could keep the group open in case people want to propose updates to the documents in the future. Or we could talk about a re-charter if there are other related work items people want to pursue. Please share your thoughts about the disposition of the group.
> 
> Thanks,
> Alissa
> _______________________________________________
> Mtgvenue mailing list
> Mtgvenue@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mtgvenue