Re: [Mtgvenue] Open issue: legal discrimination based on status/identity

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Fri, 27 January 2017 19:10 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1341A129712 for <mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 27 Jan 2017 11:10:43 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id STJ-nfECqgKV for <mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 27 Jan 2017 11:10:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pg0-x231.google.com (mail-pg0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c05::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1EE121296F9 for <mtgvenue@ietf.org>; Fri, 27 Jan 2017 11:10:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pg0-x231.google.com with SMTP id 194so83326775pgd.2 for <mtgvenue@ietf.org>; Fri, 27 Jan 2017 11:10:41 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:references:from:organization:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=zBXK6GjBYYXtdN0oSFnnoIn590VXfN4neoU2NyEeNwU=; b=ulkHKH0bEiuIR9rX30BCHiEB0w5YXxPSZcOdALhm6J+mTufU+IkdC4LBEvIB2wVra+ WQ/zZLs4kXHL1myaERCjGnSjgUYNK802vmNmEP6Nkh3OC2PDA/bfFhvPCvxmRJ66oRuD MiHqi22QuU0xy+ljP5nNJzTE6vMXVsg5V/KupeDQO2YiLbihhqEjXKbzAoV8IOwfR/Vx kHZ8lFdVdQ+HtdN/5C8TXmNKFgeGZBsBwZinOxCbajolWZ54jFsjpRCWFPF+CySA3dzt XETYkORhXrjYmQ66WpN/jeMp1hBJybbxIuKzmx912HvgjTTBCwT2aaHzvAeiSjONKzTN m60Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:organization :message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=zBXK6GjBYYXtdN0oSFnnoIn590VXfN4neoU2NyEeNwU=; b=COTA1KKGzN3KbsRBZHpTLHDzu1EvwnMqgTGjdCko5My1flzZhnVSBVUPwT+7pTLRqv R0vSRMi3iUZchtivHS/qMXMEFx2pprfsslTgb1wxZcrh0q40EDc/OyHGQ1+Y+b7FkJ90 o5ZjRJZ4l4YWZhslHfgpsyOuhM9H0Zg7/tJM2quSHNeAe9GHZs/x9sAey6It+ksgped3 xptx1yO29FP0hjaQRcteSwLxEUkkguEpj/HQ8Hcqv7ux0U7fAKs1P9FNT3guc1lzsq0v Uh+4RoevxtW/QfgL6kBy57UZbUtrdp/FYyDh91egv61c44xK9Jx6YXNol37cN/m53F4i Wqlw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXLujAOAzDlJc0bM+ZIyIKnJkFmPf9XylxC2BlICCFmyCz7Au31F+5L6WpwwLNZTqA==
X-Received: by 10.99.222.17 with SMTP id f17mr11382747pgg.127.1485544240423; Fri, 27 Jan 2017 11:10:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.178.21] ([118.149.105.221]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 82sm13158749pge.42.2017.01.27.11.10.38 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 27 Jan 2017 11:10:39 -0800 (PST)
To: dcrocker@bbiw.net, mtgvenue@ietf.org
References: <55b0639f-a084-9582-cf22-061c29001f77@nomountain.net> <e1343476-f499-bc06-b7fe-adad8e37896e@dcrocker.net>
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Organization: University of Auckland
Message-ID: <af5692ad-2cac-0419-9223-b8bc340286f2@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2017 08:10:49 +1300
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <e1343476-f499-bc06-b7fe-adad8e37896e@dcrocker.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mtgvenue/VwWaDj9MAchOzbB_Tef6pxytcDo>
Subject: Re: [Mtgvenue] Open issue: legal discrimination based on status/identity
X-BeenThere: mtgvenue@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "List for email discussion of the IAOC meeting venue selection process." <mtgvenue.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mtgvenue>, <mailto:mtgvenue-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mtgvenue/>
List-Post: <mailto:mtgvenue@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mtgvenue-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mtgvenue>, <mailto:mtgvenue-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2017 19:10:43 -0000

On 27/01/2017 10:42, Dave Crocker wrote:
> On 1/26/2017 12:41 PM, Melinda Shore wrote:
>> The "Inclusiveness" item in section 2.1 has received some
>> discussion but not real resolution.  To try to bring it
>> to closure I'd like to ask if people feel what's in there
>> is sufficient to provide guidance to the IAOC 1) in the case
>> where a country implements an entrance ban on travelers
>> from particular countries, and 2) in a case like the Singapore
>> meeting, where there are highly discriminatory laws on the
>> books that may be loosely enforced.  If you don't feel
>> it is sufficient to address those cases, please propose
>> text.  And again, this is to provide guidance to the IAOC.
> 
> 
> And to save folk the lookup effort, the -04 text on this is:
> 
>> 2.  Venue Selection Objectives
>>
>> 2.1.  Core Values
>>
>>    Some IETF values pervade the selection process.  These often are
>>    applicable to multiple requirements listed in this document.  They
>>    are not limited to the following, but at minimum include:
> ...
>>    Inclusiveness:
>>       We would like to facilitate the onsite or remote participation of
>>       anyone who wants to be involved.
>>
>>       Every country has limits on who it will permit within its borders.
>>       However the IETF seeks to:
>>
>>       1.  Minimize situations in which onerous entry regulations prevent
>>           participants from attending meetings, or failing that to
>>           distribute meeting locations such that onerous entry
>>           regulations are not always experienced by the same attendees
>>
>>       2.  Avoid meeting in countries with laws that effectively exclude
>>           people on the basis of race, religion, gender, sexual
>>           orientation, national origin, or gender identity

I may be repeating myself, but I think this text is both necessary and
sufficient. In particular I support the word "effectively" because it
allows for a pragmatic judgment call by the IAOC.

    Brian