IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Mtgvenue] Open issue: legal discrimination based on status/identity

Melinda Shore <melinda.shore@nomountain.net> Sat, 28 January 2017 01:50 UTC

Return-Path: <melinda.shore@nomountain.net>
X-Original-To: mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7F30129B6B for <mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 27 Jan 2017 17:50:16 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=nomountain-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QvEeRF_hm2_t for <mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 27 Jan 2017 17:50:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pg0-x22f.google.com (mail-pg0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c05::22f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 03422129B69 for <mtgvenue@ietf.org>; Fri, 27 Jan 2017 17:50:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pg0-x22f.google.com with SMTP id 204so85613171pge.0 for <mtgvenue@ietf.org>; Fri, 27 Jan 2017 17:50:14 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nomountain-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=rHikPfMOviI99/4MkF9guIaRHIKY9HZaGGaIQ1MyXoo=; b=TuIgiWnk5Zit5gUSf6YPlUZ/TBNGQHzY90EemlMT0XCiogp80MX+nPp3WbqfkYvf/N hvoF4ORaPyhOjg0dkSgqHgWzZ+PSXgXeARnlYJ8cgaTs9tBslsWz7YBdbcuoR3dLzcEI MO49QzCrfC4auqr9HVf3lYDhJAmml4zmMcLePUoBVDspjSXxQGStGNHHXGwsVe1/benm w4RK5oGsp+TV5Kp79Gk1FlAU6Now5SLDscdwCJGzyTXIEBf7b4Xu0CoGvQl2RqLg9HIL 894xK5Zw0ZW3IVG5EmRV+Iobc4rELEySaE5am/pzJTiEx+jAKd90IgPmMTWs7D+J5k5p oDDQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=rHikPfMOviI99/4MkF9guIaRHIKY9HZaGGaIQ1MyXoo=; b=OYFnfHVbp6/bsod62jcqiGjiIM3zIZd1MLZrevKRNVrnyxZnSisrCjpH7xJ1KGV4pO bfNiHU7cFxHIweuz3HkMtRzj9KiSMAeiCATf2f+/FVuCIoK1vBTnNMNuVoy1kUFamjyq FeviUvU21brpTmKPln0U+7gXMxO7+EURbS1jh7uEhdtb1/nPtE84kQHDUMCikgCq1oPz j8Gb7nGYgghgqycCn4CUyzmYQ0ZztvgAFbp19NIL/2awlWjBV+HSvfqXaq8eKYjtOxz6 fA4DQQHONCmWKGHFIVyoBBptuABcmOADiDi5SgxEGBm+VvrxXVuczPGr8FIUUoxR7wLt 2cvQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXLr7NA9UlwnpXNdoXY0H3oQIMWmKaHqnVkMTI0tpqyyqzoV3ttusu0VVy+xajZZQw==
X-Received: by 10.99.48.68 with SMTP id w65mr12534876pgw.107.1485568214352; Fri, 27 Jan 2017 17:50:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from Melindas-MacBook-Pro.local (63-140-80-108-radius.dynamic.acsalaska.net. [63.140.80.108]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id c11sm14124768pfe.68.2017.01.27.17.50.13 for <mtgvenue@ietf.org> (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 27 Jan 2017 17:50:13 -0800 (PST)
To: mtgvenue@ietf.org
References: <55b0639f-a084-9582-cf22-061c29001f77@nomountain.net> <6.2.5.6.2.20170127162623.0efe9cf0@elandnews.com>
From: Melinda Shore <melinda.shore@nomountain.net>
Message-ID: <0c8fb5c6-e3cd-1cf7-3168-57264e68bc78@nomountain.net>
Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2017 16:50:12 -0900
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.12; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <6.2.5.6.2.20170127162623.0efe9cf0@elandnews.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mtgvenue/Yub20XofPASwIRZ4_274bYS-y-Q>
Subject: Re: [Mtgvenue] Open issue: legal discrimination based on status/identity
X-BeenThere: mtgvenue@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "List for email discussion of the IAOC meeting venue selection process." <mtgvenue.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mtgvenue>, <mailto:mtgvenue-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mtgvenue/>
List-Post: <mailto:mtgvenue@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mtgvenue-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mtgvenue>, <mailto:mtgvenue-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2017 01:50:17 -0000

On 1/27/17 4:11 PM, S Moonesamy wrote:
> The IETF could be pushed to take a stand and that will be perceived as
> taking a political position, e.g. see (2).

Hi, SM:

This line of argumentation is unhelpful.  The problem we're
trying to solve with respect to venue selection is to establish
policies that define conditions that can or should be met
that allow IETF participants to travel to meetings
without consistently placing undue burdens on some subset.
My sense is that we're close to agreement on what's currently
in the process draft.  If there's a problem with the language
in that document, now's the time to provide feedback and
propose text.

Melinda

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email