Re: [Mtgvenue] Disposition of the group

Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com> Fri, 06 March 2020 15:05 UTC

Return-Path: <lear@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF61B3A08AA for <mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 6 Mar 2020 07:05:58 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.601
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.601 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Mp8PVtB6pr8D for <mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 6 Mar 2020 07:05:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from aer-iport-1.cisco.com (aer-iport-1.cisco.com [173.38.203.51]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F11933A090D for <mtgvenue@ietf.org>; Fri, 6 Mar 2020 07:05:56 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2380; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1583507157; x=1584716757; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc: to:references; bh=L+1cCxUXpeW+AGKtsEr1IsJAHp3J6/gbxJj8v4FN0wY=; b=FLH+b+S/7TnqFf/CJGafBja79C24CMQphPg5eD/OIsuHh5Ss1qPcmGDO wmQOkCtxfCf7Pmy2ZVsgLh3Z1y03Chz1l9F0pAbaHlcl2QB9vmmG2lg8C IOsoBaZ0fIjotL1vL44X+E0dxyJYxh6vWEWCNQEhxsoiaa0zYs3q5ryRW 8=;
X-Files: signature.asc : 488
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0BdAACNZWJe/xbLJq1lGgEBAQEBAQE?= =?us-ascii?q?BAQMBAQEBEQEBAQICAQEBAYF7g2ogEiqEFYkDh2olmz4CBwEBAQkDAQEvBAE?= =?us-ascii?q?BhEMCgjI4EwIDAQELAQEFAQEBAgEFBG2FYoVjAQEBAQIBI1YFCwsYKgICVwY?= =?us-ascii?q?TFIMSAYJbIKgFdYEyhUqEVRCBOIFTim6CAIE4DBSCTT6CZASEdDKCLASXYJh?= =?us-ascii?q?BgkaCUYEgknUcjxGMJKcVgzICBAYFAhWBaSKBWDMaCBsVZQGCQT4SGA2cZkA?= =?us-ascii?q?DMAKOTAEB?=
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.70,522,1574121600"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="24094757"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-4.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 06 Mar 2020 15:05:54 +0000
Received: from [10.61.195.175] ([10.61.195.175]) by aer-core-4.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 026F5sMQ013622 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 6 Mar 2020 15:05:54 GMT
From: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
Message-Id: <90935818-B052-4769-A05A-C04E6AF048C0@cisco.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_1A10E885-53FC-4C37-8677-76E72746775D"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha256
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.0 \(3608.60.0.2.5\))
Date: Fri, 6 Mar 2020 16:05:53 +0100
In-Reply-To: <21684.1583506696@localhost>
Cc: mtgvenue@ietf.org
To: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
References: <9B937623-5E7C-4BF1-AC9B-9CFFD5C33F93@cooperw.in> <42D0AD47-B53F-4356-BD54-F57664F7F73B@cisco.com> <C0E65A83-1752-4A2E-B2AA-C7EBC38A5780@ietf.org> <87098782-D66A-48C9-8F3E-78B8503A6114@cisco.com> <21684.1583506696@localhost>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.60.0.2.5)
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 10.61.195.175, [10.61.195.175]
X-Outbound-Node: aer-core-4.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mtgvenue/d0iGxDbDDwW9oqDEk7UMoGb31sc>
Subject: Re: [Mtgvenue] Disposition of the group
X-BeenThere: mtgvenue@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "List for email discussion of the IAOC meeting venue selection process." <mtgvenue.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mtgvenue>, <mailto:mtgvenue-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mtgvenue/>
List-Post: <mailto:mtgvenue@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mtgvenue-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mtgvenue>, <mailto:mtgvenue-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Mar 2020 15:05:59 -0000


> On 6 Mar 2020, at 15:58, Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> wrote:
> 
> Signed PGP part
> 
> Eliot Lear <lear=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
>> One of the things I believe we need to understand is this: what is the
>> footprint, inclusive of air, hotel, restaurant, as compared to people
>> not meeting?  I also think it helps to have a feel for what would
>> happen if we were to have smaller meetings, but more of them for
>> various clusters of working groups. Would footprints likely go up, stay
>> the same, etc?
> 
> Are you suggesting that we meet in areas or other verticals, rather than in plenary?
> Or am I mis-understanding.
> 

I’m suggesting that we consider all alternatives when we have a bit more data.

> I think that there are many ways that this would go the wrong direction, but
> it could be made to work in a variety of ways.  Some things I can think of might be unpopular.

So… when we have some data we should have those on the table too/

> 
>> If we were to gather that sort of information, then the community can
>> discuss what to do next.  Right now, we simply lack data.
> 
> I think we need to use IETF107 to figure out what questions to ask.
> 

I really would like the LLC & Executive Director to assist us here.  We’re engineers, not social scientists.

Eliot

> -