IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Mtgvenue] comments on draft-ietf-mtgvenue-iaoc-venue-selection-process-04

Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com> Tue, 31 January 2017 04:27 UTC

Return-Path: <lear@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF6CA128E18 for <mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Jan 2017 20:27:27 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -17.721
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-17.721 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-3.199, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DOGxWo_WU_Ei for <mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Jan 2017 20:27:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from aer-iport-4.cisco.com (aer-iport-4.cisco.com [173.38.203.54]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7384C127735 for <mtgvenue@ietf.org>; Mon, 30 Jan 2017 20:27:26 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2579; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1485836846; x=1487046446; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:mime-version: in-reply-to; bh=ERTCE7hcrv4Ko94RTdoGjln65/yb9Ox5lO9DjmJZPCw=; b=APpf8CpURwv5yTUbdVsa1nG139XjQkp5XKlBOf3EkrRYh/qEv5/kiVAC +c+UleRVj7014+wxFjR/BRwsVobtsoSMzVXOSuBpz4zFYl1vrSb4pmhsr TbrOUC0rys36+PQhuTwucHvgkb/xYHQIg3CnjwHFmoAmFeBTOcjihO2SI Q=;
X-Files: signature.asc : 481
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0BFAQA6EZBY/xbLJq1dGQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBBwEBAQEBhF+ENYoJcpETlTKCDYYiAoJoGAECAQEBAQEBAWIohGoBBSNmCxgqAgJXBgEMCAEBEIlZqxeCJYsdAQEBAQEBAQMBAQEBAQEBEg+IUIJqh0+CXwEEm1WDb4IDjAmKOIZAkn8fOIEbEwgVFYZ1P4h3AQEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.33,313,1477958400"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="652103070"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-4.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 31 Jan 2017 04:27:24 +0000
Received: from [10.61.104.16] (dhcp-10-61-104-16.cisco.com [10.61.104.16]) by aer-core-4.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id v0V4ROER004843; Tue, 31 Jan 2017 04:27:24 GMT
To: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>, dcrocker@bbiw.net, mtgvenue@ietf.org
References: <9139334c-9c5e-814d-4299-c6f5950039b8@cs.tcd.ie> <f9b2a33d-db49-54a0-a657-be58a08ff021@labn.net> <a1a08b89-9088-07e0-d878-2c171c04602b@cs.tcd.ie> <d5d75e80-1285-f510-709e-9f1e24240ec5@dcrocker.net> <518a705f-096d-cc4d-6402-5ae605c71f36@cs.tcd.ie> <1babea2c-10ad-113d-0537-4d4c49628350@dcrocker.net> <bd1e3bce-7bfd-cb65-4017-a763f415d7cd@cs.tcd.ie> <3adf8871-cec3-1555-099d-3c32bcf37315@dcrocker.net> <364b3495-4142-c92b-1489-0939026f44c8@cs.tcd.ie>
From: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <118ef5c4-dbb8-8bb9-88f6-1c78878b7736@cisco.com>
Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2017 05:27:23 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.12; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <364b3495-4142-c92b-1489-0939026f44c8@cs.tcd.ie>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="MR3dxau1K5CBIAiLJ4M9cJKHJPQPIqAA1"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mtgvenue/eMCC7LUCnHzg7TFD2RQZccsX1jo>
Subject: Re: [Mtgvenue] comments on draft-ietf-mtgvenue-iaoc-venue-selection-process-04
X-BeenThere: mtgvenue@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "List for email discussion of the IAOC meeting venue selection process." <mtgvenue.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mtgvenue>, <mailto:mtgvenue-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mtgvenue/>
List-Post: <mailto:mtgvenue@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mtgvenue-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mtgvenue>, <mailto:mtgvenue-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2017 04:27:27 -0000


On 1/30/17 7:58 PM, Stephen Farrell wrote:
> Yes. IMO the procedures/processes set out in the RFC we'll
> end up with will change significantly more often than the
> RFC will be revised. In the interests of improved IAOC
> transparency, (which I think we've agreed is a goal here)
> it'd be good if variations from that are documented somehow
> (however IAOC like is fine by me) in a way that's visible
> to the community and subject to community consensus. That
> mostly applies to section 5, but also perhaps to other
> sections. (I'd have no problem if that was a general thing
> nor if it were specific to section 5.)
>

+1.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email