Re: [Mtgvenue] Issue #24: More than 1 hq hotel?

Fred Baker <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com> Mon, 15 May 2017 18:01 UTC

Return-Path: <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE37F129440 for <mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 May 2017 11:01:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ou_OFHJLUoCd for <mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 May 2017 11:01:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pf0-x241.google.com (mail-pf0-x241.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c00::241]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49F0D126CBF for <mtgvenue@ietf.org>; Mon, 15 May 2017 10:57:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pf0-x241.google.com with SMTP id u26so16535822pfd.2 for <mtgvenue@ietf.org>; Mon, 15 May 2017 10:57:57 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=hcPCCNhjjIZkF7/pVJ9dnaysSRLpVKYRbXRmOGANMoE=; b=hdb00tEXk4DrkPh+dvsrRY+EOuMju8gWt3Fir32g4rU820a62iEIwMRoCPAvVTmLkW BpNv+DZJeCP+/25kBwgKauXGZfCc5qCxJO6Wo1/Tq4HMcCs7FddTUw8gnR0Yn8rDSePt 5Ji8RjMNxt405VHqvYp8oZF6+z9qY3crhnaiMmtNtV1wS/GhwJUN3TnXTyXtRzoHlWkj Id5StMS/LWVP2daPBwJJhdUz0m0DPAERahy4/n0AsY9tQsI3ywZ2R1kAVIZjTpS1a4Zd rJry+Yew5Pk1KEDSLmIRFjwZ/cehK2Lxp0fFhM08tzQ4VqCeYzdyYs2Kg6rVKJ4iV5fh dA1A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=hcPCCNhjjIZkF7/pVJ9dnaysSRLpVKYRbXRmOGANMoE=; b=YkacRSDUbSR7obzK+h6n6dyDY6zBxPkkIGmPtn5b96szJwULKQjvNL2cKVBBifukL5 0PxnYN5vRf3liRctNLfrtjZmgvoOYJIwG5TjttLZ3Y2EyfxqC+cuatOkANcNCB9opQgm 3WIDZQGXEWbO5iF0FA8X1E9i5OBTlThf6dN6Qx6hH57eA+5kpx76ZjN8swI+8W3ITTeb xDNoDRr0ryuYKEajrambOSMrRi9B1zHY7I7cBje7mRxm7gGS0unETnHQGRvy2qg+4Tku PZMUQlnm+46BJHSQLY2s25RPrxWL3yjLWdgNoDdisL5qf0GX9oEMRVPxUcg0RjceTLba +EhQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AODbwcB8VGErxj3/BqHrUhIBkTeJrLJRYDiXcav616HnubY3QWG4aFdp 5MnEKlu+HchZhdahsb0=
X-Received: by 10.98.138.150 with SMTP id o22mr7648640pfk.120.1494871076882; Mon, 15 May 2017 10:57:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.12] (wsip-184-191-158-59.sd.sd.cox.net. [184.191.158.59]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id s68sm24753373pfj.5.2017.05.15.10.57.55 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 15 May 2017 10:57:55 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\))
From: Fred Baker <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <8359.1494857281@obiwan.sandelman.ca>
Date: Mon, 15 May 2017 10:57:54 -0700
Cc: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>, "mtgvenue@ietf.org" <mtgvenue@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <5E2AB9FC-525B-4EDC-A19E-EC43774CC74E@gmail.com>
References: <9a41874c-24e2-aa0c-e58c-7bee8b35f91b@cisco.com> <2247.1494795324@obiwan.sandelman.ca> <e83d3fe9-4394-b82a-0a75-008329ef62a8@cisco.com> <8359.1494857281@obiwan.sandelman.ca>
To: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mtgvenue/ixD8qPFO8Xq2ZQ3fAix58F508VI>
Subject: Re: [Mtgvenue] Issue #24: More than 1 hq hotel?
X-BeenThere: mtgvenue@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "List for email discussion of the IAOC meeting venue selection process." <mtgvenue.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mtgvenue>, <mailto:mtgvenue-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mtgvenue/>
List-Post: <mailto:mtgvenue@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mtgvenue-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mtgvenue>, <mailto:mtgvenue-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 May 2017 18:01:13 -0000

On May 15, 2017, at 7:08 AM, Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> wrote:
> How can a lounge
> in a non-HQ Hotel be between the meeting room and hotel entrance if
> there are no meeting rooms in the overflow hotel?

I think you're missing something there. The document right now says

   o  There are sufficient places (e.g., a mix of hallways, bars,
      meeting rooms, and restaurants) for people to hold ad hoc
      conversations and group discussions in the combination of spaces
      offered by the facilities, hotels and bars/restaurants in the
      surrounding area, within walking distance (5-10').

and with respect to the lounge:

   o  At least one IETF Hotel has a space for use as a lounge, conducive
      to planned and ad hoc meetings and chatting, as well as working
      online.  There are tables with seating, convenient for small
      meetings with laptops.  These can be at an open bar or casual
      restaurant.  Preferably the lounge area is on the path between the
      meeting rooms and the hotel entrance, and is available all day and
      night.

At any IETF I have been to, there has been at most one designated lounge, and there has been no attempt to provide one in a secondary hotel. If one is staying in a secondary hotel, the first consideration applies: "please feel free to use facilities a short walk from the hotel."  The designated central hotel, if there is one, would likely be the place you would find the lounge.