Re: [Mtgvenue] Priority order:

[Dave Crocker <[e-mail]>]

On 1/30/2017 8:16 AM, Eliot Lear wrote:
> It makes clear what's most important at a gross level.  I was actually
> surprised this wasn't the case and had initially presumed this was due
> to going back and forth on some of the criteria.


Eliot,

The requirements labels already make that clear.  And in the tabular 
form in the recent versions, it's quite easy to see those labels.

Having a claim that thinks are rank-ordered by priority carries the 
message that decision processes will treat entries differently, based on 
the ordering.  But that won't happen.

Again, this is the sort of thing that is entirely naturally to want to 
do, but in fact is either useless or misleading.  As such, it will 
mostly serve to confuse things, either within the decision process or 
when interacting with the community.

d/

-- 

   Dave Crocker
   Brandenburg InternetWorking
   bbiw.net