IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Mtgvenue] What does "mandatory mean?"

Melinda Shore <melinda.shore@nomountain.net> Tue, 31 January 2017 22:30 UTC

Return-Path: <melinda.shore@nomountain.net>
X-Original-To: mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 168AD129BE0 for <mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 31 Jan 2017 14:30:13 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=nomountain-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BMgYOBC_as5X for <mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 31 Jan 2017 14:30:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pf0-x236.google.com (mail-pf0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c00::236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E1F5F129BD9 for <mtgvenue@ietf.org>; Tue, 31 Jan 2017 14:30:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pf0-x236.google.com with SMTP id e4so111824184pfg.1 for <mtgvenue@ietf.org>; Tue, 31 Jan 2017 14:30:11 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nomountain-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to; bh=WiL7fnFn5le72BoI/kWj09d4ciMj2uf0uHLUn/KWQYk=; b=fG2QuJKxb2myIDPd0p1BuZXjjVXJ1BQ2Aqb8O2dUwILqZPX2F/lY+VE6DtjTOgXLKp R9E8tcxBQ/RT7KPgNvbX5UAxgMX49CRMUna28IYgSKTxSalRE8FouZ006TgfFxITV6BB C2+eIdA917UTAiRKPReSgvi+TsnrwFQqp94thGtlOl3Fgg9hWb5S6KSEqD4bj5qWQ0JJ xLiZ1gZSyS4S7GLKBU7sbxzaxa3TYPR7DqT89SmPUSQUcRWyq6l/PTNJhphda6ldZvBS CGVXErPMB/MGN4LLsJoST08ZoiPDZg/HykSPDGnYpYSiDR35UKRT4IFkr108t9aqBnKG jpDg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=WiL7fnFn5le72BoI/kWj09d4ciMj2uf0uHLUn/KWQYk=; b=ZZzYhCA9XL2Ak6Qakx+S8K9qhYcRswJ8T2n6qiYJh9kMuVjwVOHGslu5A9hhRaUxvf Ikk5xOKFGwxobZLkbICIdGq5PajqOq5hdi9Jfmg/IrCbvY0or5opgoZggLMba2Fq9OQS cKtYnu0sJdqZNSqpEX4/OqrcBHFGNDur9Ryi+L+qH8z/E8RpJPok7szTOYQR18Nc5Jy5 As5egxv7v2UbHT2EQx4y3lLn+fd8omrU/MtI+d/J2LEjPfB64K3CLEybrFQyJeC2f0qz yaqWlHlMU6zuyeZYiloIvWuZjzXi1KdZM83Q7DIJIL627CyuHlSDxIGZInVLJiSNWrgX hZ5Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXJ+4eVvx/qT9ss9SlBeMxyDk9h60iqIP9FVaNEu98d/14Jdq+yetQvglqlz7NP7+A==
X-Received: by 10.84.217.85 with SMTP id e21mr43269777plj.109.1485901811515; Tue, 31 Jan 2017 14:30:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from Melindas-MacBook-Pro.local (74-124-96-230-radius.dynamic.acsalaska.net. [74.124.96.230]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id c204sm43594121pfb.51.2017.01.31.14.30.10 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 31 Jan 2017 14:30:10 -0800 (PST)
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>, mtgvenue@ietf.org
References: <20170131010548.GL47762@mx2.yitter.info> <de401360-8827-c427-19fe-ace8d2987f40@gmail.com> <20170131040757.GM47762@mx2.yitter.info> <2c957e0e-999f-f8a2-3a61-3aff3606b087@dcrocker.net> <20170131152139.GC53056@mx2.yitter.info> <47488b7f-29f0-f082-c3c0-8dc201c5dea7@nomountain.net> <15eb228a-c81d-62a5-a64c-0ff1ff959030@gmail.com>
From: Melinda Shore <melinda.shore@nomountain.net>
Message-ID: <c96bc2b0-ca43-e012-09cf-650b67711d8e@nomountain.net>
Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2017 13:30:08 -0900
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.12; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <15eb228a-c81d-62a5-a64c-0ff1ff959030@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="cV62uscocld4npHSgmBH6aGqbqLmRl9sg"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mtgvenue/jrLS5Pq9B4GoLMCm13SvQi5Pbg4>
Subject: Re: [Mtgvenue] What does "mandatory mean?"
X-BeenThere: mtgvenue@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "List for email discussion of the IAOC meeting venue selection process." <mtgvenue.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mtgvenue>, <mailto:mtgvenue-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mtgvenue/>
List-Post: <mailto:mtgvenue@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mtgvenue-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mtgvenue>, <mailto:mtgvenue-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2017 22:30:13 -0000

On 1/31/17 10:50 AM, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
> My point is a bit more subtle, and I tried to explain in the
> reply I just sent to Andrew. It's *intended* to apply to the
> venue, but it unintentionally applies to the IAOC process of
> making judgment calls.


It's a good point, although I'm not sure it's necessary
to build firewalls against the IAOC doing really stupid
things (I've been wrong about that sort of things before).
The main thing is that I think we're blocked on
this until some alternative text is proposed.  Presumably
we can continue the discussion without personalizing it.

Melinda

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email