Re: [Mtgvenue] Question on text about change of process

Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net> Fri, 10 February 2017 06:20 UTC

Return-Path: <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
X-Original-To: mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C48A1298A6 for <mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Feb 2017 22:20:53 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zH2cmGoAkVtD for <mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Feb 2017 22:20:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from p130.piuha.net (p130.piuha.net [IPv6:2a00:1d50:2::130]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 581D6129465 for <mtgvenue@ietf.org>; Thu, 9 Feb 2017 22:20:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id F14392CCBA; Fri, 10 Feb 2017 08:20:49 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from jari.arkko@piuha.net)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at piuha.net
Received: from p130.piuha.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (p130.piuha.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0egi9BZOYegf; Fri, 10 Feb 2017 08:20:49 +0200 (EET)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (p130.piuha.net [IPv6:2a00:1d50:2::130]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54D5A2CC9C; Fri, 10 Feb 2017 08:20:49 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from jari.arkko@piuha.net)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_884C94BF-40F1-4D4A-8975-B4EB8562CFC3"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail
From: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
In-Reply-To: <60B998E9-BC9C-4C55-BC0F-0422569AE783@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2017 08:20:47 +0200
Message-Id: <B28191C7-7869-464D-A01B-DA599A997D28@piuha.net>
References: <afa22b35-c538-87ce-6d24-987e6ee1bc38@nomountain.net> <60B998E9-BC9C-4C55-BC0F-0422569AE783@gmail.com>
To: Fred Baker <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mtgvenue/kkXq-pllmTHmdNNuWv1baxHFQlA>
Cc: mtgvenue@ietf.org, Melinda Shore <melinda.shore@nomountain.net>
Subject: Re: [Mtgvenue] Question on text about change of process
X-BeenThere: mtgvenue@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "List for email discussion of the IAOC meeting venue selection process." <mtgvenue.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mtgvenue>, <mailto:mtgvenue-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mtgvenue/>
List-Post: <mailto:mtgvenue@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mtgvenue-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mtgvenue>, <mailto:mtgvenue-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2017 06:20:53 -0000

I’m fine with Dave’s variant and placement of the text.

I’m not sure the text changes any special requirement, so I’m not
sure if Fred your question applies here. But the docs are planned
to be BCPs, I believe.

Jari