IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Mtgvenue] I-D Action: draft-ietf-mtgvenue-iaoc-venue-selection-process-14.txt

Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com> Thu, 10 May 2018 15:08 UTC

Return-Path: <lear@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3450212EB38; Thu, 10 May 2018 08:08:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.511
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dd1LOG1Xw4-Y; Thu, 10 May 2018 08:08:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aer-iport-1.cisco.com (aer-iport-1.cisco.com [173.38.203.51]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 51B6F12DA09; Thu, 10 May 2018 08:08:03 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2338; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1525964883; x=1527174483; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=X/Z0CcUYVrJmc9m+L0Mxo0TU9ab948YLVvnamtZya/s=; b=NLiuqkkV1mw0xHa6qFEko6jpTUcvQrYBLJa2VRJl4oxV/fM7Igv5arSK xBa/vfyJ79CFlKETYxJQJU96K54uuUsjkiTZ8hUiU91YROyGkzPwIVm13 i4bjIr8n6UDh46tR+cvOxT72aiLN8MSMPEooY2LmrdRRApNBidfYVjbKG I=;
X-Files: signature.asc : 488
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0B2AQAEX/Ra/xbLJq1cGQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQcBAQEBAYUfhBmIYY1fKYEPkzMUgWQIA4RsAoMhNRcBAgEBAQEBAQJsKIUpAQUjVhALGCoCAlcGAQwIAQGDHwKBf6swghyIR4I5D4o4gTKCaIRbgxiCVAKYLQmDRIFUiTEGgSiGLIURgiuOK4ElHgMzgVIzGggbFYJ/gkeOCD2QaAEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="5.49,385,1520899200"; d="asc'?scan'208"; a="3762280"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-2.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 10 May 2018 15:08:01 +0000
Received: from [10.61.65.84] (ams3-vpn-dhcp340.cisco.com [10.61.65.84]) by aer-core-2.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id w4AF80Cp024121; Thu, 10 May 2018 15:08:01 GMT
To: Mary B <mary.h.barnes@gmail.com>, Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>
Cc: "mtgvenue@ietf.org" <mtgvenue@ietf.org>, ietf <IETF@ietf.org>
References: <152584638193.2839.7801870228413280951@ietfa.amsl.com> <c30fd21a-85ee-734c-771c-00ff65490acb@cisco.com> <CABmDk8=HKLR89dvDTuO4eguPE5LCV-YPmcbBr1WdUuFNi+NsBw@mail.gmail.com> <20180510021428.GG9500@mx4.yitter.info> <CABmDk8=jyJ_AD+gH10-=Bp2f8Ed-kyxC+8j+gjpq-4N7CsXdzQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
Openpgp: preference=signencrypt
Autocrypt: addr=lear@cisco.com; prefer-encrypt=mutual; keydata= xsBNBFMe1UQBCADdYOS5APDpIpF2ohAxB+nxg1GpAYr8iKwGIb86Wp9NkK5+QwbW9H035clT lpVLciExtN8E3MCTPOIm7aITPlruixAVwlBY3g7U9eRppSw9O2H/7bie2GOnYxqmsw4v1yNZ 9NcMLlD8raY0UcQ5r698c8JD4xUTLqybZXaK2sPeJkxzT+IwupRSQ+vXEvFFGhERQ88zo5Ca Sa1Gw/Rv54oH0Dq2XYkO41rhxQ60BKZLZuQK1d9+1y3I+An3AJeD3AA31fJZD3H8YRKOBgqe ILPILbw1mM7gCtCjfvFCt6AFCwEsjITGx55ceoQ+t5B5XGYJEppMWsIFrwZsfbL+gP31ABEB AAHNJUVsaW90IExlYXIgPGxlYXJAb2Zjb3Vyc2VpbXJpZ2h0LmNvbT7CwHsEEwECACUCGwMG CwkIBwMCBhUIAgkKCwQWAgMBAh4BAheABQJTHtXCAhkBAAoJEIe2a0bZ0nozBNoH/j0Mdnyg CgNNmI4DyL9mGfTJ/+XiTxWXMK4TTszwwn/tsXjyPQWjoO6nYqz5i96ItmSpkelSGVpzU+LK LQxSjFeUvKw23bp1rVecfGR+OENSE1m6KfFj3vtzQOZ2/FgK210MWnlYNNyAHX6Pf6hKInTP v6LbZiAQMCmf0aPvRbk/aPSNJAuIKrLrrCgAlwelrTavFsSwnKI3dhSG8DJ9+z/uiXDiHYra Ub3BKp5K/x71Zd8hUsWm2simnE/6HvZaZz7CC29JSZ/5gGtNB3OMNKLzLWUbQacF3IKxpW66 ZFYFYnlBV4jRnKlmb40YcEXWVJkkVC8g+/J9Qo6R8BdmSTXOwE0EUx7VRAEIALRZXth1u/3n FgY+G2FN0KEEik+2Xsk8JX9zr/eISa+Ol8a4U1orgxpyP2V7bQQDkDUEfs+Asagc6I8zrk3K xGln3pFFVfdM18uaEYwWvmE84Y12r7FwYdW62bA9X1Ttsp5Q1GI8XHdh0SQTF12pXYTwWW1P THYVIp7bGzM88cHqBW0xyRflu4j2nUrd9tWFd28SRxhj+MHQkQkbKFLloRty3lwdS8MCRPzX 9gUrkl+DxFHC7WrW3Vi4glI5YBlD0n2hSyDoP1GkKVT60gUGh7eJOnUBR8lzKm5wYqAtgq2m 79rKBylA40diRhbnTTeY+ytqMWFF5UXm97Jwxsezi7kAEQEAAcLAXwQYAQIACQUCUx7VRAIb DAAKCRCHtmtG2dJ6M5K5CADbunatgHsqHbR3KbpXxzralakEcdODGv/fbN6/EdKJeXrG9QKD lPxZTB9STw6+ANwESsr9uUMAxdDNKDeynjnQmFHxGdcdcXlnPZPThfseeUhUkbB/YKOfDIQA kKozNoKYj6Dcia+D/wvifIEW+GUUcO/6Qi8yK6PLJyM8C7vHEqmUGzX8gTCYOgAyOd4WZrC9 95CfB0yFIorw+MpK7MZTm5SbGPcYF9Gq9MzSqmaEw8U6YOElKYfnkcsCTLYyWaolhck+3/0R 9ISEWK5rUzqAuK40S4+Sn7yNycdCoqvQh4e3xSpzAu3aYZ8jKXQVV0X2G9Y+M1HMZuCqhPUO LTdF
Message-ID: <123a1046-3ed1-f304-b5d3-3ae0dab73f19@cisco.com>
Date: Thu, 10 May 2018 17:08:00 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.13; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CABmDk8=jyJ_AD+gH10-=Bp2f8Ed-kyxC+8j+gjpq-4N7CsXdzQ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="N3M8deiMTaNh522rUxVUXuaufZmNhNwgG"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mtgvenue/m9H5oDHrleqFsJ6PA-_3uDMRpWA>
Subject: Re: [Mtgvenue] I-D Action: draft-ietf-mtgvenue-iaoc-venue-selection-process-14.txt
X-BeenThere: mtgvenue@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "List for email discussion of the IAOC meeting venue selection process." <mtgvenue.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mtgvenue>, <mailto:mtgvenue-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mtgvenue/>
List-Post: <mailto:mtgvenue@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mtgvenue-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mtgvenue>, <mailto:mtgvenue-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 May 2018 15:08:07 -0000


On 10.05.18 17:03, Mary B wrote:
> Andrew’s suggestion of removing he non-smoking bullet and adding the
> general one is fine with me.  My big issue was that if we were
> explicitly including mandatory requirements for non-smoking then the
> mold should be given equal consideration. 

Just to be clear, the old text was never removed.  Only new text was
added.  That new text in Section 3.1 would be removed.

Eliot

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email