Re: [Mtgvenue] Where we are, post #2
Melinda Shore <melinda.shore@nomountain.net> Tue, 31 January 2017 05:18 UTC
Return-Path: <melinda.shore@nomountain.net>
X-Original-To: mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B54B129DE3 for <mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Jan 2017 21:18:18 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=nomountain-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hwjRpSFzz058 for <mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Jan 2017 21:18:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pf0-x229.google.com (mail-pf0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c00::229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 44A8E129DDA for <mtgvenue@ietf.org>; Mon, 30 Jan 2017 21:18:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pf0-x229.google.com with SMTP id 189so99639654pfu.3 for <mtgvenue@ietf.org>; Mon, 30 Jan 2017 21:18:17 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nomountain-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to; bh=HY2/PWzCJ6xdikyKTkfuwsfmCHBVmVOjYhPssw86fZk=; b=TjnEB1ITOnw9jqhV94hCv1NX6BdVctGPwzDcEq3yy7Na4pNPB2ANnXFZupfdY+JqeZ kMnuUNB9Mfd5mEWAhS8xF1yqsPSsx8BWD0NHJXF24p7IwVzbnZ3nPc4/lKP3XFWAU9qI l5u+wCWxR+rTPgie7102VyLKNKfQxjG5a7HPNy3edzcx0IZtKY0EDx2E6/WGbMgBd2Ll Nuq246KZmmr4kTUPgliq14WM7xueDYl6AkRGziBT2t6EIZUwrexe43XvlBT5cKt94U3c 5XlFmQRF0leE7D6buuuerR8e1Tb71E1GDBVWa84b38ugMni0o2ouwDlhrMD2CsvPl6x6 WLSg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=HY2/PWzCJ6xdikyKTkfuwsfmCHBVmVOjYhPssw86fZk=; b=SPgpA7Xf1mteXJt/yfS+2hXk1AM9R/EZIlTJBUmv+DiX04qahf+oAsrW8wUubukKsw CiUZ9NGm054+SaeojFtyRqqbZn+hlWSOxPHi5o6IzxFE0N7pcjar+TKqMyX1ClYWe4/9 J4ENKMXlbcXbrBe4e1bp4lXWZqfFAdeJ24skZpsY7XflMlIBNWEcVK/QrczLABTQqWP8 uJZq8ujXs3wmvcLxqiOxQAIZzsQWZcZqVfmmLkCew2xA9I2nyhTD3GVKFc9W6yG4hBfm Z+L088mP/Tx1KHj0b9EzGNVbsmNQXY0z8Xrm0VOYhztsk4epJUTT1HYfjtBU9N3jR9PJ h3Bg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXL6dS6cSt1QsP4Gixuv3jXBZj46i0e+up4VdEHXbopkl4VT/dYYCvTqO6RINcTsrg==
X-Received: by 10.98.153.25 with SMTP id d25mr27610142pfe.15.1485839896724; Mon, 30 Jan 2017 21:18:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from Melindas-MacBook-Pro.local (216-67-56-130-radius.dynamic.acsalaska.net. [216.67.56.130]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id b75sm36576731pfb.90.2017.01.30.21.18.15 for <mtgvenue@ietf.org> (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 30 Jan 2017 21:18:16 -0800 (PST)
To: mtgvenue@ietf.org
References: <056312a7-741c-77af-8759-657aedb24f43@nomountain.net> <8e501210-5db5-c8db-5aa0-0f58a0a90d59@gmail.com> <a0ebba80-e028-9b5a-e531-384b0706049f@dcrocker.net> <0E900203-6558-4E8C-A166-9B1E5B36E2AE@fugue.com>
From: Melinda Shore <melinda.shore@nomountain.net>
Message-ID: <698d46e1-4ea9-f646-bf65-1ffbe6bba486@nomountain.net>
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2017 20:18:10 -0900
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.12; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <0E900203-6558-4E8C-A166-9B1E5B36E2AE@fugue.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="XQl9tfgtI6rPrDcLiWh4g8c2jk0gf7qbt"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mtgvenue/p_pva5rI8PxLZk5SfSxDwi64hK4>
Subject: Re: [Mtgvenue] Where we are, post #2
X-BeenThere: mtgvenue@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "List for email discussion of the IAOC meeting venue selection process." <mtgvenue.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mtgvenue>, <mailto:mtgvenue-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mtgvenue/>
List-Post: <mailto:mtgvenue@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mtgvenue-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mtgvenue>, <mailto:mtgvenue-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2017 05:18:18 -0000
On 1/30/17 2:40 PM, Ted Lemon wrote: > On Jan 30, 2017, at 5:49 PM, Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net > <mailto:dhc@dcrocker.net>> wrote: >> Without those words, the entry would read: >> A range of attendee's >> dietary requirements can be satisfied with >> robust and flexible onsite service or through >> access to an adequate grocery. >> >> In editorial terms, that certainly sounds clear and meaningful. > The only problem with this text is that "a range" isn't defined, and > would not be sufficient to clue in a clueless IAOC. A couple of points: 1) I don't think that we're likely to have an IAOC meetings committee on which no member has a clue about this stuff, and 2) since the proposed locations are going to be run past the IETF, anyway, there's going to be a backstop in place. Melinda
- [Mtgvenue] Where we are, post #2 Melinda Shore
- Re: [Mtgvenue] Where we are, post #2 Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [Mtgvenue] Where we are, post #2 Dave Crocker
- Re: [Mtgvenue] Where we are, post #2 Ted Lemon
- Re: [Mtgvenue] Where we are, post #2 Dave Crocker
- Re: [Mtgvenue] Where we are, post #2 Melinda Shore
- Re: [Mtgvenue] Where we are, post #2 Melinda Shore