Re: [Mtgvenue] I-D Action: draft-ietf-mtgvenue-iaoc-venue-selection-process-06.txt

[Brian E Carpenter <[e-mail]>]

I don't know whether the Chairs have the ability to add a link to the tracker page for the draft. If not, that could be a feature request for the tools team.

Also, I don't know whether the Chairs have the ability to modify the "Additional URLs" at https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/mtgvenue/about/

Meanwhile, maybe just add a note in the draft itself?

Regards
    Brian
On 20/04/2017 08:48, Charles Eckel (eckelcu) wrote:
> I agree. Any suggestions for how to make it easier for folks to find the link?
> 
> Thanks,
> Charles
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: "[e-mail]" <[e-mail]>
> Organization: University of Auckland
> Date: Tuesday, April 18, 2017 at 9:23 PM
> To: Charles Eckel <[e-mail]>, "[e-mail]" <[e-mail]>, "[e-mail]" <[e-mail]>
> Subject: Re: [Mtgvenue] I-D Action: draft-ietf-mtgvenue-iaoc-venue-selection-process-06.txt
> 
>     Thanks! That seems a bit hard to find from the tracker.
>     
>        Brian
>     
>     
>     On 19/04/2017 10:32, Charles Eckel (eckelcu) wrote:
>     > https://github.com/elear/mtgvenue/issues
>     > 
>     > Cheers,
>     > Charles
>     > 
>     > -----Original Message-----
>     > From: Mtgvenue <[e-mail]> on behalf of "[e-mail]" <[e-mail]>
>     > Organization: University of Auckland
>     > Date: Tuesday, April 18, 2017 at 1:54 PM
>     > To: "[e-mail]" <[e-mail]>, "[e-mail]" <[e-mail]>
>     > Subject: Re: [Mtgvenue] I-D Action: draft-ietf-mtgvenue-iaoc-venue-selection-process-06.txt
>     > 
>     >     Hi Eliot,
>     >     
>     >     Could you kindly remind us where the issue tracker is?
>     >     
>     >     Regards
>     >        Brian
>     >     
>     >     On 18/04/2017 19:46, Eliot Lear wrote:
>     >     > Hi everyone,
>     >     > 
>     >     > This draft intends to address the following issues:
>     >     > 
>     >     >   * #1: What means "mandatory/important/..."
>     >     >   * #3: Too much mandatory
>     >     >   * #4: Process innovation
>     >     >   * #5: Clarity on definitions re hotel rooms and the facility in Section 3
>     >     >   * #6: Terminology hard to follow
>     >     >   * #7: Clarity of responsibility
>     >     >   * #8: What if Target list of cities is not known?
>     >     >   * #9: Concurrent objection?
>     >     >   * #10: What happens if there is a change of policies in the interim?
>     >     >   * #11: Text seems strange
>     >     >   * #12: Sponsor required as mandatory?
>     >     >   * #13: Handling repeats
>     >     >   * #16: What is consensus on? venue selection or process?
>     >     >   * #17: Timing of 3 month final check
>     >     > 
>     >     > Each of these issues has been tagged with the -06 milestone.
>     >     > 
>     >     > Probably we will not need to do anything with issue 18 (Align
>     >     > mandatories with values).
>     >     > 
>     >     > I would expect there to be additional issues opened at this point, as I
>     >     > might have got something wrong.  This draft is yours, not mine, so
>     >     > please feel free to offer proposed edits or backouts (I'll have a few
>     >     > myself with my editor hat off).  Speaking of which, let me draw your
>     >     > attention to Section 5.  In my opinion we have not yet settled on
>     >     > chapeau text, and have left an editorial comment in there indicating as
>     >     > such.  In addition, In addressing issues 10 and 17, as well as Alissa's
>     >     > comments, I've attempted to provide some guidance as to what should
>     >     > happen AFTER the contract is signed, but it is relatively minimal.  My
>     >     > suggestion is that if we cannot agree on some text along those lines
>     >     > relatively quickly we simply excise the section.
>     >     > 
>     >     > There are a number of newer issues that need to be addressed and are
>     >     > not.  There are also some issues that are holding, pending resolution of
>     >     > the above.  As such, you might reasonably expect an update in May based
>     >     > on this working group's progress.
>     >     > 
>     >     > Eliot
>     >     > 
>     >     > On 4/18/17 9:44 AM, [e-mail] wrote:
>     >     >> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
>     >     >> This draft is a work item of the Meeting Venue of the IETF.
>     >     >>
>     >     >>         Title           : IETF Plenary Meeting Venue Selection Process
>     >     >>         Authors         : Ray Pelletier
>     >     >>                           Laura Nugent
>     >     >>                           Dave Crocker
>     >     >>                           Lou Berger
>     >     >>                           Ole Jacobsen
>     >     >>                           Jim Martin
>     >     >>                           Fred Baker
>     >     >>                           Eliot Lear
>     >     >> 	Filename        : draft-ietf-mtgvenue-iaoc-venue-selection-process-06.txt
>     >     >> 	Pages           : 28
>     >     >> 	Date            : 2017-04-18
>     >     >>
>     >     >> Abstract:
>     >     >>    The IAOC has responsibility for arranging IETF plenary meeting Venue
>     >     >>    selection and operation.  This document details the IETF's Meeting
>     >     >>    Venue Selection Process from the perspective of its goals, criteria
>     >     >>    and thought processes.  It points to additional process documents on
>     >     >>    the IAOC Web Site that go into further detail and are subject to
>     >     >>    change with experience.
>     >     >>
>     >     >>
>     >     >> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
>     >     >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mtgvenue-iaoc-venue-selection-process/
>     >     >>
>     >     >> There are also htmlized versions available at:
>     >     >> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-mtgvenue-iaoc-venue-selection-process-06
>     >     >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-mtgvenue-iaoc-venue-selection-process-06
>     >     >>
>     >     >> A diff from the previous version is available at:
>     >     >> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-mtgvenue-iaoc-venue-selection-process-06
>     >     >>
>     >     >>
>     >     >> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
>     >     >> until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
>     >     >>
>     >     >> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
>     >     >> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
>     >     >>
>     >     >> _______________________________________________
>     >     >> Mtgvenue mailing list
>     >     >> [e-mail]
>     >     >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mtgvenue
>     >     >>
>     >     > 
>     >     > 
>     >     > 
>     >     > 
>     >     > _______________________________________________
>     >     > Mtgvenue mailing list
>     >     > [e-mail]
>     >     > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mtgvenue
>     >     > 
>     >     
>     >     _______________________________________________
>     >     Mtgvenue mailing list
>     >     [e-mail]
>     >     https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mtgvenue
>     >     
>     > 
>     
>