Re: [Mtgvenue] Comments on -04

Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com> Tue, 31 January 2017 16:12 UTC

Return-Path: <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>
X-Original-To: mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62E4C129504 for <mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 31 Jan 2017 08:12:16 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vuT2ziM4986m for <mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 31 Jan 2017 08:12:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx2.yitter.info (mx2.yitter.info [50.116.54.116]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19265129503 for <mtgvenue@ietf.org>; Tue, 31 Jan 2017 08:12:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx2.yitter.info (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7046B11626 for <mtgvenue@ietf.org>; Tue, 31 Jan 2017 16:12:18 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at crankycanuck.ca
Received: from mx2.yitter.info ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mx2.yitter.info [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2oDsnClaiDlU for <mtgvenue@ietf.org>; Tue, 31 Jan 2017 16:12:17 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mx2.yitter.info (192-0-220-231.cpe.teksavvy.com [192.0.220.231]) by mx2.yitter.info (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B140411621 for <mtgvenue@ietf.org>; Tue, 31 Jan 2017 16:12:17 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2017 11:12:12 -0500
From: Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>
To: mtgvenue@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20170131161212.GE53056@mx2.yitter.info>
References: <20170131010548.GL47762@mx2.yitter.info> <de401360-8827-c427-19fe-ace8d2987f40@gmail.com> <20170131040757.GM47762@mx2.yitter.info> <2c957e0e-999f-f8a2-3a61-3aff3606b087@dcrocker.net> <20170131152139.GC53056@mx2.yitter.info> <26b344aa-4901-9aba-0795-ab4319c8a9da@dcrocker.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <26b344aa-4901-9aba-0795-ab4319c8a9da@dcrocker.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mtgvenue/xKPLeFUH_lKiOFWgkE5lFHC77kc>
Subject: Re: [Mtgvenue] Comments on -04
X-BeenThere: mtgvenue@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "List for email discussion of the IAOC meeting venue selection process." <mtgvenue.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mtgvenue>, <mailto:mtgvenue-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mtgvenue/>
List-Post: <mailto:mtgvenue@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mtgvenue-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mtgvenue>, <mailto:mtgvenue-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2017 16:12:16 -0000

Hi Dave,

On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 07:46:16AM -0800, Dave Crocker wrote:
> Which of the previous times your concerns were raised developed that
> support?  Please point me to the mailing list content that produced that
> agreement, and in particular please indicate what changes were agreed to.

As I think my note already said, you win.  I'll stop discussing it

> Interesting.  I raise a very specific process concern -- including reference
> to the prior dates -- and you return with a generic (and undocumented) ad
> hominem.  Nice.

My apologies, you're right, it is wrong to point to things off-list.
I hereby withdraw that remark.

But in any case, you have not responded to my concerns about the
various definitional issues, which I think are rather more important
since this document is supposed to guide the IAOC.  I can't understand
how it will do that if the definitions in the document are not
actually what people are supposed to use.

Best regards,

A

-- 
Andrew Sullivan
ajs@anvilwalrusden.com