Re: [Mtgvenue] Disposition of the group

Pete Resnick <> Sun, 26 April 2020 21:58 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 629B43A1394 for <>; Sun, 26 Apr 2020 14:58:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id j60nhfzGK5dL for <>; Sun, 26 Apr 2020 14:58:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1F7563A1393 for <>; Sun, 26 Apr 2020 14:58:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id C09DCAA699FA; Sun, 26 Apr 2020 16:58:48 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id d-iM6RIsbq0j; Sun, 26 Apr 2020 16:58:47 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from [] ( []) by (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6C87DAA699EE; Sun, 26 Apr 2020 16:58:47 -0500 (CDT)
From: "Pete Resnick" <>
To: "Alissa Cooper" <>
Date: Sun, 26 Apr 2020 16:58:26 -0500
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.13.1r5683)
Message-ID: <>
In-Reply-To: <>
References: <>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; markup=markdown
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [Mtgvenue] Disposition of the group
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "List for email discussion of the IAOC meeting venue selection process." <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Apr 2020 21:58:55 -0000

Hi Alissa,

There was quite a bit of excitement between when you sent this message 
and now (to say the least) that you had to work on, but I was wondering 
if you made a decision on this. I personally think it would be 
reasonable to leave the mailing list live, close down the group, and 
then create a new charter if we find some more work that needs to be 
done in the future, and I don't think I've heard anyone on the list say 
anything particularly different. On the other hand, I'm also fine with 
going into a dormant mode as a WG and re-chartering when the time comes, 
if that is easier administratively. Whatever works for you.


On 5 Mar 2020, at 13:01, Alissa Cooper wrote:

> Hi all,
> The two deliverables for this group have been published: RFC 8718 and 
> RFC 8719. Thanks to everyone who contributed.
> At this point we could close the group. If we do that, I think we 
> should keep the mailing list open. Or we could keep the group open in 
> case people want to propose updates to the documents in the future. Or 
> we could talk about a re-charter if there are other related work items 
> people want to pursue. Please share your thoughts about the 
> disposition of the group.
> Thanks,
> Alissa