Re: What's your favorite MTU?
art@opal.acc.com (Art Berggreen) Fri, 13 April 1990 07:24 UTC
Received: from decwrl.dec.com by acetes.pa.dec.com (5.54.5/4.7.34) id AA03300; Fri, 13 Apr 90 00:24:22 PDT
Received: by decwrl.dec.com; id AA11809; Tue, 10 Apr 90 09:58:11 -0700
Received: by opal.acc.com (4.0/SMI-4.0) id AA27286; Tue, 10 Apr 90 09:58:06 PDT
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 1990 09:58:06 -0700
From: art@opal.acc.com
Message-Id: <9004101658.AA27286@opal.acc.com>
To: mogul, mtudwg
Subject: Re: What's your favorite MTU?
>A little research in the RFC archives, however, suggests that >there are actually very few reasonable values for Path MTUs. >I count about 9, although I could be missing some. I went >through all the RFCs listed in RFC1130 as describing IP encapsulations, >made a chart of the MTUs specified, and arranged them in declining >order. Then I grouped similar values together, and picked a set >of plateaus corresponding to the least element in each group. >In most cases, the choice of groups is quite clear; I'm a little >concerned about the plateaus I picked at smaller MTU sizes, but >none of my values is more than 17% from optimal for its group. > >The new algorithm is to step down through the plateaus until >you hit one which is lower than your previous attempted IP Length. >In the FDDI-SLIP-FDDI scenario, this converges in 5 RTTs, not 10. >FDDI-Ethernet-FDDI converges in two steps, to within 3% of optimal. I'm a bit concerned about building into a protocol the MTUs that happen to be used on today's network technologies. >The table at the end of this message shows my results (the figures >in parentheses show how far from optimal the worst-case member of >each group lies). > >I would appreciate it if people could correct any mistakes in this >table, and tell me about data links (such as Amateur Packet Radio) >that I've left out. Also, if I've included any data links that >are completely obsolete, please let me know! > >-Jeff > >PMTU-plateau MTU Protocol Comments Specification > > 65535 IP Official Maximum MTU RFC 791 > 65535 IP-HC Hyperchannnel RFC 1044 >65535 > 8166 IP-IEEE IEEE 802.4 RFC 1042 >8166 > 4478 IP-FDDI FDDI RFC 1103 >4478 > 2048? IP-WB Wideband Network RFC 907 > 2002 IP-IEEE IEEE 802.5 RFC 1042 Don't 16Mbit TRs support much larger MTUs? >2002 (2%) > 1536 IP-EE Exp. Ethernet Nets RFC 895 > 1500 IP-E Ethernet Networks RFC 894 > 1492 IP-IEEE IEEE 802.3 RFC 1042 >1492 (3%) > 1006 IP-SLIP Serial Lines RFC 1055 > 1006 IP-ARPA ARPANET BBN 1822 >1006 > 576 IP-X25 X.25 Networks RFC 877 There is no inherent MTU limit in X25 (using M-bit sequences). In fact if large X.25 packet sizes can be negotiated, there are real advantages in using a larger MTU. > 544 Portal DEC IP Portal -------- > 512 IP-NETBIOS NETBIOS RFC 1088 > 508 IP-IEEE IEEE 802/Source-Rt Bridge RFC 1042 > 508 IP-ARC ARCNET/extended RFC 1051 >508 (13%) > 296 IP-SLIP Serial Lines (Van Jacobson) RFC 1055 > 253 IP-ARC ARCNET RFC 1051 >252 (17%) > >68 IP Official minimum MTU RFC 791 > > Don't Know IP-DC DC Networks RFC 891 > > Art
- What's your favorite MTU? Jeffrey Mogul
- Re: What's your favorite MTU? Art Berggreen
- Re: What's your favorite MTU? Jeffrey Mogul
- Re: What's your favorite MTU? Drew Daniel Perkins
- Re: What's your favorite MTU? Drew Daniel Perkins
- What's your favorite MTU? Fred Bohle acc_gnsc
- Re: What's your favorite MTU? Jeffrey Mogul
- Re: What's your favorite MTU? Drew Daniel Perkins