Re: Informational RFC may need review - Common DNS Operational and Configuration Errors
Dave Barr <barr@math.psu.edu> Thu, 01 June 1995 00:15 UTC
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa10813; 31 May 95 20:15 EDT
Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa10809; 31 May 95 20:15 EDT
Received: from ietf.cnri.reston.va.us by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa19914; 31 May 95 20:15 EDT
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa10801; 31 May 95 20:15 EDT
Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa10797; 31 May 95 20:15 EDT
Received: from venera.isi.edu by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa19906; 31 May 95 20:15 EDT
Received: from leibniz.math.psu.edu by venera.isi.edu (5.65c/5.61+local-22) id <AA24557>; Wed, 31 May 1995 17:16:11 -0700
Received: from augusta.math.psu.edu (barr@augusta.math.psu.edu [146.186.132.2]) by leibniz.math.psu.edu (8.6.10/8.6.9) with ESMTP id UAA29489; Wed, 31 May 1995 20:16:06 -0400
Received: from localhost (barr@localhost) by augusta.math.psu.edu (8.6.10/8.6.9) with ESMTP id UAA03308; Wed, 31 May 1995 20:16:06 -0400
Message-Id: <199506010016.UAA03308@augusta.math.psu.edu>
X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.1 5/23/95
To: jkrey@isi.edu, set@bellcore.com, scoya@CNRI.Reston.VA.US
Cc: rfc-editor@isi.edu, iesg@isi.edu
Subject: Re: Informational RFC may need review - Common DNS Operational and Configuration Errors
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 30 May 1995 15:22:06 PDT." <199505302222.AA03218@akamai.isi.edu>
X-Face: $+9-wYg.[->94HJ{go[7Q]E!K&hUg7ZhLyCMyq_FU*ca0GazE>^/2BKLcK0bP-'%; Nn?M<m c~dP_j^A?M5Jw{+a7vcMu|M-mq"V4AzKq?mPMMNP\; f8J0n\-L]ODU)YMP; -pF>+am,jlSP>1K$iz@ %'v'FEW{@](U&Ed/}>ju3Ctlr!XwJ27Q)7h2a%"`sz; j:/3EC[mXi@*X@HE1]'ddq$ZX"ePsMyTkeg >zdML.SV<t=R>vX1W`adGIUD
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Date: Wed, 31 May 1995 20:16:05 -0400
X-Orig-Sender: iesg-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Dave Barr <barr@math.psu.edu>
In message <199505302222.AA03218@akamai.isi.edu>, jkrey@ISI.EDU writes: >In the msg below that you sent to the rfc-editor you stated, >"I'll get in touch with the author to ask him to do this." > >What is the status? Let me first note that the RFC has been submitted as an I-D. (draft-barr-dns-errors-01.txt) I plan on sending in a first revision (-01) soon. >----- Begin Included Message ----- > >Date: Fri, 12 May 1995 11:22:16 -0400 (EDT) >From: Susan E Thomson <set@bellcore.com> >To: rfc-editor@ISI.EDU >Subject: Re: Informational RFC may need review - Common DNS Operational and Co >nfiguration Errors >Cc: iesg@ISI.EDU > >Joyce and Jon > >I would like to have a note added to the RFC stating the following: > >Please note that this is an individual contribution by the author and >is not a product of any IETF working group. I don't plan to add this. I see no precedence for adding such a disclaimer. The fact that it is not a product of a working group is clearly evident by its filename. As an RFC, I don't see others having disclaimers either. If there are plans for an IETF WG to address this subject I'd love to know. I'd be even happier to get comments where this document may conflict with or omit items being addressed by an IETF WG. >Second, I would like the members of the namedroppers mailing list to >be given a chance to comment on this memo before it is published as an >RFC. I'll get in touch with the author to ask him to do this. I thought namedroppers got a copy of the I-D ACTION notice, but I guess not. I'm sending a notice there now. (in the document's earlier stages I had sent a notice to bind-workers) --Dave