Re: RFC1006 extension ISO Transport Class 2 Non-use of Explicit Flow Control over TCP

bound@zk3.dec.com Tue, 16 May 1995 16:22 UTC

Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa07247; 16 May 95 12:22 EDT
Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa07243; 16 May 95 12:22 EDT
Received: from ietf.cnri.reston.va.us by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa09085; 16 May 95 12:22 EDT
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa07235; 16 May 95 12:22 EDT
Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa07231; 16 May 95 12:22 EDT
Received: from venera.isi.edu by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa09080; 16 May 95 12:22 EDT
Received: from inet-gw-1.pa.dec.com by venera.isi.edu (5.65c/5.61+local-22) id <AA06815>; Tue, 16 May 1995 09:23:01 -0700
Received: from xirtlu.zk3.dec.com by inet-gw-1.pa.dec.com (5.65/24Feb95) id AA06298; Tue, 16 May 95 09:17:14 -0700
Received: by xirtlu.zk3.dec.com; id AA09524; Tue, 16 May 1995 12:17:07 -0400
Message-Id: <9505161617.AA09524@xirtlu.zk3.dec.com>
To: Harald.T.Alvestrand@uninett.no
Cc: bound@zk3.dec.com, Yanick <pouffary@taec.enet.dec.com>, mankin@isi.edu, postel@isi.edu, iesg@isi.edu, dan@netrix.lkg.dec.com, ned@innosoft.com
Subject: Re: RFC1006 extension ISO Transport Class 2 Non-use of Explicit Flow Control over TCP
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 16 May 95 11:29:34 +0200." <199505160929.LAA07073@dale.uninett.no>
Date: Tue, 16 May 95 12:17:01 -0400
X-Orig-Sender: iesg-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: bound@zk3.dec.com
X-Mts: smtp

Yes this clarifies things.

thanks
/jim