conclusion of Ran complaint
Allison Mankin <mankin@isi.edu> Wed, 17 May 1995 15:05 UTC
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa05407; 17 May 95 11:05 EDT
Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa05403; 17 May 95 11:05 EDT
Received: from ietf.cnri.reston.va.us by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa07520; 17 May 95 11:05 EDT
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa05396; 17 May 95 11:05 EDT
Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa05392; 17 May 95 11:05 EDT
Received: from zephyr.isi.edu by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa07515; 17 May 95 11:05 EDT
Received: from zephyr.isi.edu by zephyr.isi.edu (5.65c/5.61+local-17) id <AA00217>; Wed, 17 May 1995 08:06:14 -0700
Message-Id: <199505171506.AA00217@zephyr.isi.edu>
To: iesg@CNRI.Reston.VA.US
Subject: conclusion of Ran complaint
Reply-To: mankin@isi.edu
Date: Wed, 17 May 1995 08:06:13 -0700
X-Orig-Sender: iesg-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Allison Mankin <mankin@isi.edu>
Till the next occasion... ------- Forwarded Message Date: Wed, 17 May 1995 06:56:30 -0400 From: Ran Atkinson <rja@bodhi.cs.nrl.navy.mil> To: mankin@ISI.EDU cc: deering@parc.xerox.com, rcallon@wellfleet.com Subject: Re: appearance of closed IPv6 decision making Allison, Between your note (with updating the online information) and Bob's note (and his effort to try to get spec discussions redirected onto the main IPng list) and some personal lobbying, I think I've resolved my local legal issues in a reasonable manner. The main thing I keep being told is that "substantive discussions of possible spec changes should not be on a list advertised as only for implementater testing and coordination", so NRL will keep our spec related comments on the IPng list. Sorry for the nuisance. Thanks, Ran atkinson@itd.nrl.navy.mil ------- End of Forwarded Message
- conclusion of Ran complaint Allison Mankin