conclusion of Ran complaint

Allison Mankin <mankin@isi.edu> Wed, 17 May 1995 15:05 UTC

Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa05407; 17 May 95 11:05 EDT
Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa05403; 17 May 95 11:05 EDT
Received: from ietf.cnri.reston.va.us by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa07520; 17 May 95 11:05 EDT
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa05396; 17 May 95 11:05 EDT
Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa05392; 17 May 95 11:05 EDT
Received: from zephyr.isi.edu by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa07515; 17 May 95 11:05 EDT
Received: from zephyr.isi.edu by zephyr.isi.edu (5.65c/5.61+local-17) id <AA00217>; Wed, 17 May 1995 08:06:14 -0700
Message-Id: <199505171506.AA00217@zephyr.isi.edu>
To: iesg@CNRI.Reston.VA.US
Subject: conclusion of Ran complaint
Reply-To: mankin@isi.edu
Date: Wed, 17 May 95 08:06:13 PDT
X-Orig-Sender: iesg-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Allison Mankin <mankin@isi.edu>

Till the next occasion...


------- Forwarded Message

Date:    Wed, 17 May 1995 06:56:30 -0400
From:    Ran Atkinson <rja@bodhi.cs.nrl.navy.mil>
To:      mankin@ISI.EDU
cc:      deering@parc.xerox.com, rcallon@wellfleet.com
Subject: Re: appearance of closed IPv6 decision making

Allison,

  Between your note (with updating the online information) and Bob's
note (and his effort to try to get spec discussions redirected onto
the main IPng list) and some personal lobbying, I think I've resolved
my local legal issues in a reasonable manner.  The main thing I keep
being told is that "substantive discussions of possible spec changes
should not be on a list advertised as only for implementater testing
and coordination", so NRL will keep our spec related comments on the
IPng list.

  Sorry for the nuisance.

Thanks,

Ran
atkinson@itd.nrl.navy.mil


------- End of Forwarded Message