Mods to DF scheme

sytek!rfox@Sun.COM (Rich Fox) Wed, 07 March 1990 21:28 UTC

Received: from decwrl.dec.com by acetes.pa.dec.com (5.54.5/4.7.34) id AA03206; Wed, 7 Mar 90 13:28:18 PST
Received: by decwrl.dec.com; id AA11248; Wed, 7 Mar 90 13:28:09 -0800
Received: from sun.Sun.COM (sun-bb.Corp.Sun.COM) by Sun.COM (4.1/SMI-4.1) id AA11146; Wed, 7 Mar 90 13:27:50 PST
Received: from sytek.UUCP by sun.Sun.COM (4.1/SMI-4.1) id AA28527; Wed, 7 Mar 90 13:26:35 PST
Received: by sytek.hls.hac.com (5.51/5.17) id AA15972; Wed, 7 Mar 90 11:31:44 PST
Date: Wed, 7 Mar 90 11:31:44 PST
From: sytek!rfox@Sun.COM (Rich Fox)
Message-Id: <9003071931.AA15972@sytek.hls.hac.com>
To: mtudwg
Subject: Mods to DF scheme

If we use the DF bit I think we should try and solve the complete problem
without allocating another bit. Before we asked the IAB for a bit because
we said this is the only way to solve the problem. Well in essence we have
that bit, so lets not go asking for another bit. 


rich