Re: decreases in MTU
Philippe Prindeville <philipp@Gipsi.Gipsi.Fr> Tue, 06 March 1990 00:02 UTC
Received: from decwrl.dec.com by acetes.pa.dec.com (5.54.5/4.7.34) id AA17453; Mon, 5 Mar 90 16:02:20 PST
Received: by decwrl.dec.com; id AA23213; Mon, 5 Mar 90 15:54:12 -0800
Received: from [192.33.166.11] by inria.inria.fr (5.61+/89.0.8) via Fnet-EUnet id AA10499; Tue, 6 Mar 90 00:51:26 +0100 (MET)
Received: by Gipsi.Gipsi.Fr (4.12/4.8) id AA17250; Tue, 6 Mar 90 00:52:38 -0100 (MET)
Date: Tue, 06 Mar 1990 00:52:38 -0100
From: Philippe Prindeville <philipp@Gipsi.Gipsi.Fr>
Message-Id: <9003052352.AA17250@Gipsi.Gipsi.Fr>
X-Phone: +33 1 30 60 75 25 / +33 1 47 34 42 74
To: deering@pescadero.stanford.edu
Subject: Re: decreases in MTU
Cc: MTU Discovery <mtudwg>
It would be just as easy to mandate that *all* gateways employ the new type of Can't Fragment message. However, mandating does not make it so. Sorry, instead of "easy" I should have said "realistic". Van's new RFC on TCP header compression recommends small MTUs for low speed (i.e., 19,200 bps and lower) links, to give reasonable interactive responsiveness. The DARPA PR (packet radio) net has a sub-576 MTU -- is it still in use in the Internet? What's the MTU for IP on AppleTalk? I don't mean to sound snotty -- but are these "real" (or substantial) networks? I don't consider ARCnet substantive, for example: it is suitable for running netware on your PC (again, neither of which is substantive). Yes, IP is powerful because it runs on anything save two tin cans and a piece of string. But if all you have is two tin cans and a piece of string, maybe there is a more appropriate protocol. What I'm trying to say, and perhaps not succeeding, is that one has to draw the line somewhere or everything becomes dragged down to the lowest common denominator and lost in endless compromise. For Van's needs, for example, 19.2k is obviously inadequate (it is for me as well) -- he is just wasting time trying to make the lack of a vital resource a little more bearable. The solution is obvious, though: more bandwidth. -Philip P.S. I just know I'm going to be flamed. Sigh.
- decreases in MTU Rich Fox
- Re: decreases in MTU Steve Deering
- Re: decreases in MTU Philippe Prindeville
- Re: decreases in MTU Steve Deering
- Re: decreases in MTU Philippe Prindeville
- re: decreases in MTU Craig Partridge
- re: decreases in MTU Philippe Prindeville