Re: RF flag

jnc@PTT.LCS.MIT.EDU (Noel Chiappa) Mon, 11 December 1989 23:54 UTC

Received: from decwrl.dec.com by acetes.pa.dec.com (5.54.5/4.7.34) id AA06096; Mon, 11 Dec 89 15:54:22 PST
Received: by decwrl.dec.com; id AA08414; Mon, 11 Dec 89 15:54:09 -0800
Received: by PTT.LCS.MIT.EDU id AA29180; Mon, 11 Dec 89 18:53:46 EST
Date: Mon, 11 Dec 89 18:53:46 EST
From: jnc@PTT.LCS.MIT.EDU (Noel Chiappa)
Message-Id: <8912112353.AA29180@PTT.LCS.MIT.EDU>
To: jnc@PTT.LCS.MIT.EDU
Subject: Re: RF flag
Cc: deering@pescadero.stanford.edu, jnc@lcs.mit.edu.mtudwg

	Well, I checked with the IESG about 'The Bit', and while there wasn't
a clear consensus about what we *should* use it for, the general feeling was
that MTU discovery probably wasn't it. So, that one's out (although you could
still have such a bit, albeit in an option which you insert every so often).

	Noel