re: some further musings
art@sage.acc.com Wed, 06 December 1989 18:26 UTC
Received: from decwrl.dec.com by acetes.pa.dec.com (5.54.5/4.7.34) id AA03779; Wed, 6 Dec 89 10:26:15 PST
Received: by decwrl.dec.com; id AA05553; Wed, 6 Dec 89 10:25:52 -0800
Message-Id: <8912061825.AA05553@decwrl.dec.com>
Date: Wed, 06 Dec 1989 08:34:00 -0800
From: art@sage.acc.com
Subject: re: some further musings
To: mtudwg <mtudwg>
>What would folks think about combining these two schemes. That is >defining both IP options: 1063's for infrequent but periodic usage >for determining MTU increases; and the report-N-fragmentations for >setting-up triggers for the immedaite discovery of MTU decreases. > >Keith. Keith, If I understand your "report-N-fragmentations", then I am concerned about the state that must be kept. If the state is only in the end system, then state must be kept for each IP source. If state is kept in the router, then state must be kept for each IP source/destination pair. Also, would the report be generated for N successive fragmentations (probably not), N fragmentations within M packets, N framentations in time T, or ??? +-----------------------------------------------------------------------+ | Art Berggreen Advanced Computer Communications | | <art@sage.acc.com> Santa Barbara Street | | (805)963-9431 Santa Barbara, CA 93101 | +-----------------------------------------------------------------------+
- some further musings smb
- re: some further musings Craig Partridge
- Re: some further musings Philippe Prindeville
- re: some further musings Keith Mc Cloghrie
- re: some further musings Philippe Prindeville
- re: some further musings art
- re: some further musings Keith Mc Cloghrie