Re: Sue's note
Frank Kastenholz <kasten@ftp.com> Thu, 01 June 1995 12:19 UTC
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa01799; 1 Jun 95 8:19 EDT
Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa01795; 1 Jun 95 8:19 EDT
Received: from ietf.cnri.reston.va.us by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa04736; 1 Jun 95 8:19 EDT
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa01787; 1 Jun 95 8:19 EDT
Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa01783; 1 Jun 95 8:19 EDT
Received: from venera.isi.edu by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa04731; 1 Jun 95 8:19 EDT
Received: from ftp.com (wd40.ftp.com) by venera.isi.edu (5.65c/5.61+local-22) id <AA10015>; Thu, 1 Jun 1995 05:20:01 -0700
Received: from ftp.com by ftp.com ; Thu, 1 Jun 1995 08:19:59 -0400
Received: from mailserv-D.ftp.com by ftp.com ; Thu, 1 Jun 1995 08:19:59 -0400
Received: from kasten.europa by mailserv-D.ftp.com (5.0/SMI-SVR4) id AA07319; Thu, 1 Jun 95 08:17:12 EDT
Date: Thu, 01 Jun 1995 08:17:12 -0400
Message-Id: <9506011217.AA07319@mailserv-D.ftp.com>
To: set@bellcore.com
Subject: Re: Sue's note
X-Orig-Sender: iesg-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Frank Kastenholz <kasten@ftp.com>
Reply-To: kasten@ftp.com
Cc: iesg@isi.edu
X-Orig-Sender: kasten@mailserv-d.ftp.com
Repository: mailserv-D.ftp.com, [message accepted at Thu Jun 1 08:17:05 1995]
Originating-Client: europa
Content-Length: 872
> I am happy with Paul's second paragraph.
I second this.
> I would prefer to leave my first paragraph as is ...
Welllllllllll, the nosmohT paragraph is certainly less inflamatory
than the sirtepakcoM draft. And that _is_ how/why we migrated from
the lleD'O draft... But the sirtepakcoM version of the paragraph,
especially the last sentence, may be closer to the truth; at least
the truth as perceived by some people. At the very least, the last sentence
should probably read something like:
Some members of the IESG believe that they added some new functions.
But I don't really care one way or the other...
The third paragraph is fine, by the way.
--
zlohnetsaK knarF "The dogmas of the quiet past are inadequate to the stormy
present... As our case is new, so we must think anew, and
act anew" - nlocniL .A
- Re: Sue's note Frank Kastenholz