Mods to Steve Deering's "DF" scheme
fab%saturn.ACC.COM@salt.acc.com (Fred Bohle acc_gnsc) Tue, 06 March 1990 18:33 UTC
Received: from decwrl.dec.com by acetes.pa.dec.com (5.54.5/4.7.34) id AA23922; Tue, 6 Mar 90 10:33:54 PST
Received: by decwrl.dec.com; id AA27326; Tue, 6 Mar 90 10:33:45 -0800
Received: from SATURN.ACC.COM by salt.acc.com (5.61/1.34) id AA29808; Tue, 6 Mar 90 10:34:39 -0800
Received: by saturn.acc.com (5.51/1.28) id AA15334; Tue, 6 Mar 90 13:31:45 EST
Date: Tue, 06 Mar 1990 13:31:45 -0500
From: fab%saturn.ACC.COM@salt.acc.com
Message-Id: <9003061831.AA15334@saturn.acc.com>
To: mtudwg
Subject: Mods to Steve Deering's "DF" scheme
Jeff writes: >From: mogul@decwrl.dec.com (Jeffrey Mogul) >Message-Id: <9003052130.AA16912@acetes.pa.dec.com> >Date: 5 Mar 1990 1330-PST (Monday) >Subject: Modifications to Steve Deering's "DF" scheme > >I propose to fix this by using a "spare" IP Header bit (if the Proteon >gateways don't drop packets with unrecognized TOS bits, that's probably --- Why not use the "RF" bit we were discussing in the FLAGS field? Right next to the "DF" bit. That is the bit we were going to use before. Besides, it applies to fragmentation, so let's keep it with the other fragmentation bits. Fred ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Fred Bohle EMAIL: fab@saturn.acc.com ACC AT&T : 301-290-8100 10220 Old Columbia Road Columbia, MD 21046 ------------------------------------------------------------------------
- Mods to Steve Deering's "DF" scheme Fred Bohle acc_gnsc
- Re: Mods to Steve Deering's "DF" scheme Jeffrey Mogul
- Mods to Steve Deering's "DF" scheme John Moy
- Re: Mods to Steve Deering's "DF" scheme Jeffrey Mogul