Re: Comments on PMTU-Draft-RFC
Philippe Prindeville <philipp@Gipsi.Gipsi.Fr> Mon, 05 February 1990 13:02 UTC
Received: from decwrl.dec.com by acetes.pa.dec.com (5.54.5/4.7.34) id AA01379; Mon, 5 Feb 90 05:02:20 PST
Received: by decwrl.dec.com; id AA09399; Mon, 5 Feb 90 05:02:02 -0800
Received: from [192.33.166.11] by inria.inria.fr (5.61+/89.0.8) via Fnet-EUnet id AA15746; Mon, 5 Feb 90 14:01:49 +0100 (MET)
Received: by gipsi.Gipsi.Fr (4.12/4.8) id AA05555; Mon, 5 Feb 90 02:39:16 -0100 (MET)
Date: Mon, 05 Feb 1990 02:39:16 -0100
From: Philippe Prindeville <philipp@Gipsi.Gipsi.Fr>
Message-Id: <9002050139.AA05555@gipsi.Gipsi.Fr>
X-Phone: +33 1 30 60 75 25 / +33 1 47 34 42 74
To: MTU Discovery <mtudwg>
Subject: Re: Comments on PMTU-Draft-RFC
As for the two-byte MTU field, you could change the units to 8 byte chunks (the granularity of fragmentation). This would yield an MTU maximum of 512KBytes. -Philip
- Comments on PMTU-Draft-RFC Nuggehalli Pradeep
- Re: Comments on PMTU-Draft-RFC Keith Mc Cloghrie
- Re: Comments on PMTU-Draft-RFC Steve Deering
- Re: Comments on PMTU-Draft-RFC Jeffrey Mogul
- Re: Comments on PMTU-Draft-RFC Philippe Prindeville
- Re: Comments on PMTU-Draft-RFC Philippe Prindeville