Re: How to use an IP-header bit for Path MTU discovery.

Philippe Prindeville <philipp@Gipsi.Gipsi.Fr> Sun, 25 February 1990 13:03 UTC

Received: from decwrl.dec.com by acetes.pa.dec.com (5.54.5/4.7.34) id AA24110; Sun, 25 Feb 90 05:03:48 PST
Received: by decwrl.dec.com; id AA25040; Sun, 25 Feb 90 05:03:37 -0800
Received: from [192.33.166.11] by inria.inria.fr (5.61+/89.0.8) via Fnet-EUnet id AA20217; Sun, 25 Feb 90 14:02:51 +0100 (MET)
Received: by gipsi.Gipsi.Fr (4.12/4.8) id AA15531; Sun, 25 Feb 90 14:03:50 -0100 (MET)
Date: Sun, 25 Feb 90 14:03:50 -0100
From: Philippe Prindeville <philipp@Gipsi.Gipsi.Fr>
Message-Id: <9002251303.AA15531@gipsi.Gipsi.Fr>
X-Phone: +33 1 30 60 75 25 / +33 1 47 34 42 74
To: deering@pescadero.stanford.edu
Subject: Re: How to use an IP-header bit for Path MTU discovery.
Cc: MTU Discovery <mtudwg>

Would be it be so bad to require intra-subnet fragmentation/reassembly
on tiny-gram subnets?  It could be done either at level 2 or 3...

-Philip