Re: HOWCUM
mankin@isi.edu Wed, 31 May 1995 14:46 UTC
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa02610; 31 May 95 10:46 EDT
Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa02603; 31 May 95 10:46 EDT
Received: from ietf.cnri.reston.va.us by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa07846; 31 May 95 10:46 EDT
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa02589; 31 May 95 10:46 EDT
Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa02585; 31 May 95 10:46 EDT
Received: from zephyr.isi.edu by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa07841; 31 May 95 10:46 EDT
Received: by zephyr.isi.edu (5.65c/5.61+local-17) id <AA29998>; Wed, 31 May 1995 07:46:51 -0700
Date: Wed, 31 May 1995 07:46:51 -0700
X-Orig-Sender: iesg-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: mankin@isi.edu
Message-Id: <199505311446.AA29998@zephyr.isi.edu>
To: iesg@CNRI.Reston.VA.US
Subject: Re: HOWCUM
I like Sue's draft a lot too. It will still cause the DoD folks to be angry, but the bottom line there is that they would like ST2 to be in the standards track. Short of reconsidering that IESG decision, Sue's disclaimer is the best way for us to go. Allison
- Re: HOWCUM mankin