IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Mud] changes to draft-richardson-opsawg-mud-iot-dns-considerations-03.txt

tirumal reddy <kondtir@gmail.com> Fri, 25 September 2020 08:16 UTC

Return-Path: <kondtir@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mud@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mud@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04C973A129D; Fri, 25 Sep 2020 01:16:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XkQjg4BrICRg; Fri, 25 Sep 2020 01:16:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io1-xd34.google.com (mail-io1-xd34.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d34]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 80D103A129A; Fri, 25 Sep 2020 01:16:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io1-xd34.google.com with SMTP id y74so1774238iof.12; Fri, 25 Sep 2020 01:16:45 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=a6nkuWjpMoYVAsYBvb3b+yWowde+giPW3docOCKHNLE=; b=UguMlLkbEJJ5cHjiP8uMY47GgrtAe5EzRoOTaACJiccDjqNENOG+of5jro2HcfUIEH hmbW/rG7NSZVcLZvj44OkoLe3OPmVTs1x6x0xxfBE2u6dBEPr1iGQc74cNiIWiIst8FC Dt1OrMgqTs7Md+IB7FWIFCIp9UDUqrzbe0nypYtUWWT5+UZqtj73L898q38mccdvEZ2j 5+ih9FTqQSXbL2TSibdm7kohmDZHa1k9p0D2o0dZAGziOYG0MHd5mgzvbuLQ4a4w/iFb st27lQnxLX8SWz7H1CsHIzP9EFXUfI/18QiAGTIK1PTTfY9cyyERqpxzTnX6LXEB4ucE jvgQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=a6nkuWjpMoYVAsYBvb3b+yWowde+giPW3docOCKHNLE=; b=DPT2uKVMKZDoVGKW/V0F2vsWEMQceSu0VdTKGDLc+ADmurk3UubWwcKSOw66BqbOPn kW1squXdtJO95gDPm6nVD1QUIBJeXGlaB1baJ0m/810Yj6exkmBsxvvDlZvX4qSvN0Nu z2L9jUjqUVDKxNjIPJ6lHMfgTgqS7q2uoJ9BtnOT428USuFPyAvKmUNpQv3HTClSdzaL gm+dWUor4/55Y41y66b88MR0mhjtuJaIBUyoSktU6KwLaVqPvguUQbcCgVEGW4VOFtyJ JsdR4qUcHTvo1Ld0ombPiLYF1o/iKJ0hsfI+8MOa6ghAFBdRQwD3oA5eOhQig0XGhw70 g0Vg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533Uu7Q+wfT+UtGH8KXe/OJFmJSd0ERBghrDMCg7OJCtStDSL5SZ 9qfRlzC3555PSjg5kbh17zQzysCjY5hxqbMwLyX5iBwqqOmBWw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxf6HS/IkGkdIWHNG7arCcAAdALgDhbKpMfviaolCL8M/sSWUbcoiJvbxY6l6DQdUl0sjGPYepsCQCRonJsZi4=
X-Received: by 2002:a02:8802:: with SMTP id r2mr2398590jai.75.1601021804626; Fri, 25 Sep 2020 01:16:44 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <160082461431.2339.6222888407127336620@ietfa.amsl.com> <15779.1600960819@localhost> <BCB5CBD9-78C0-471A-8C32-88E4FD406136@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <BCB5CBD9-78C0-471A-8C32-88E4FD406136@cisco.com>
From: tirumal reddy <kondtir@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2020 13:46:33 +0530
Message-ID: <CAFpG3gdMxw2QGUFhWQELYT8oaMgVuvc5_hQf_Pfk3T3vwc2rmA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Eliot Lear <lear=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
Cc: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>, opsawg <opsawg@ietf.org>, mud@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000f145f405b01eef41"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mud/ApB1IQwUh2H61PAYo536iqEeYl8>
Subject: Re: [Mud] changes to draft-richardson-opsawg-mud-iot-dns-considerations-03.txt
X-BeenThere: mud@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of Manufacturer Ussage Descriptions <mud.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mud>, <mailto:mud-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mud/>
List-Post: <mailto:mud@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mud-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mud>, <mailto:mud-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2020 08:16:47 -0000

+1.
The problem is not just with public resolvers but also with designated
resolvers. The IoT device supporting MUD must use the encrypted DNS server
discovered in the attached network.

-Tiru

On Thu, 24 Sep 2020 at 21:53, Eliot Lear <lear=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
wrote:

>
>
> > On 24 Sep 2020, at 17:20, Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > I would like the OPSAWG to consider adopting this MUD related document.
> > It changes no bits on the wire changes to MUD or semantic changes (like
> my
> > other document), rather this is guidance to IoT manufacturers.
> >
>
> I’d like that too.
>
> Eliot
>
> --
> Mud mailing list
> Mud@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mud
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email