Re: [Mud] [OPSAWG] The future of MUD work
Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Wed, 31 July 2019 10:14 UTC
Return-Path: <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Original-To: mud@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mud@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE631120033 for <mud@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 31 Jul 2019 03:14:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LCFG8vTf3kxz for <mud@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 31 Jul 2019 03:14:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qk1-x72e.google.com (mail-qk1-x72e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::72e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D91DD12009C for <mud@ietf.org>; Wed, 31 Jul 2019 03:14:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qk1-x72e.google.com with SMTP id a27so48791012qkk.5 for <mud@ietf.org>; Wed, 31 Jul 2019 03:14:39 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=AnXKg57BlOJEQ6PFxzwyenc3+jBLtDsFufrmxh6GIP0=; b=s8QvICSvvMUIaXS7vl59B+Hcm4Cse9f+pD7JxC5UeGrWz8xsQNLl5WxS3vgwWK7Vzw YG+9AnhwWvk1mdOoC707gWgWjX70Q0MASD3koTZRDRG5QWne2d2r1IEgyaTUJtKhngJG sRDz54cfVEfvmKbfDNq1w0bFiRr14HFXKIsgnsw3GGa762gjMCfZz3Qw8INWvarEHHpN OG2aa+C5SIC6G68j2JLgBent3tN322+Ly8kg+fERf7aWWerdRkAyjefcPI5vOe25ue7x NuHWQXLUs/NRJd6EYBtVqzU9dWOwAMiHW399vR1u8J7u3XCsLc4a4LykM8Z+0yhhDhsl vtiQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=AnXKg57BlOJEQ6PFxzwyenc3+jBLtDsFufrmxh6GIP0=; b=oifrVvzCX//WwttS8qeT8z5uzillqSOzf6b8I0aEp7DxVwo/AJyp2nD87GsR5Qxwsa f5l/svoNU7O4shSFfo3hDNExmJvMEmHg80ir/TH1A1Ro89sjSrJ7lENOuqAjyX7uZEiO yqeqJhmIGeDANPhAJgL2aBKyKrxLAVBhlG8T6V5QQ8+vyZqTtBYjYV0YXUPrdSPwCELq 8gTe7dfVihWyMphzPUVImVt9WB5CZlIj9WEVWVIEKCGmd7zdofD1hR6osrnuyw6QPzKA 2alyxlcFi6EMk3NwXIvWwIQWgTCeZZE1rOaOA6sHGvD2brqdhF1+qNHfBbQExwXtYnsR +C9Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUGDgkGVF0o46U2kmyTxHAVLLydBpRvxWQQWP3VMliFU9Id4tpF QeUpT2o804n37C6Omd1tjZPGtQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwNFHvJlTjM8eICSna/SN4bbmOAgho6FG0IXcNtrHdOZdQrM8BKwz9IBuWHmB8N5Ye11KSx8w==
X-Received: by 2002:ae9:dfc3:: with SMTP id t186mr76438342qkf.461.1564568078838; Wed, 31 Jul 2019 03:14:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2601:182:cc01:fc23:c976:18a2:7bd2:d55d? ([2601:182:cc01:fc23:c976:18a2:7bd2:d55d]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id s7sm28799840qtq.8.2019.07.31.03.14.37 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 31 Jul 2019 03:14:38 -0700 (PDT)
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Message-Id: <19F53DA6-C652-4695-ACB1-12745271A0CB@fugue.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_6302382F-92B1-4C3E-8C3A-FEC81B63F3C1"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.11\))
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2019 06:14:36 -0400
In-Reply-To: <DC608C90-ADBE-4D31-A226-D441F784D5E4@cisco.com>
Cc: "Joe Clarke (jclarke)" <jclarke@cisco.com>, "opsawg@ietf.org" <opsawg@ietf.org>, "ops-ads@ietf.org" <ops-ads@ietf.org>, mud@ietf.org
To: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
References: <D9AF7D6E-7434-4AE4-A2A5-26CD52C2FE20@cisco.com> <849DED7F-6701-4B26-9645-0B076A224C05@cisco.com> <DC608C90-ADBE-4D31-A226-D441F784D5E4@cisco.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.11)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mud/Hv66ebIx_C6YVHZJXVDaRUrrqso>
Subject: Re: [Mud] [OPSAWG] The future of MUD work
X-BeenThere: mud@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of Manufacturer Ussage Descriptions <mud.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mud>, <mailto:mud-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mud/>
List-Post: <mailto:mud@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mud-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mud>, <mailto:mud-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2019 10:14:43 -0000
On Jul 31, 2019, at 4:45 AM, Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com> wrote: > On the other hand, it shouldn’t just be me. It’d be a very small working group ;-) If others are interested, they should speak up. I don’t think I would necessarily initiate work, but I suspect if there were a MUD WG I would show up for it and review documents. The fact that MUD is in OPSAWG has meant that I don’t go because that’s not a WG I normally go to, and I didn’t realize that was where the MUD work was happening.
- Re: [Mud] [OPSAWG] The future of MUD work Eliot Lear
- Re: [Mud] [OPSAWG] The future of MUD work Ted Lemon
- Re: [Mud] [OPSAWG] The future of MUD work tirumal reddy
- Re: [Mud] [OPSAWG] The future of MUD work Michael Richardson
- Re: [Mud] [OPSAWG] The future of MUD work Qin Wu