Re: [Mud] Updated Manufactures supporting MUD

Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com> Wed, 08 July 2020 07:32 UTC

Return-Path: <lear@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: mud@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mud@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F18AD3A0C03 for <mud@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 Jul 2020 00:32:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vuc3J09twaYI for <mud@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 Jul 2020 00:32:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aer-iport-3.cisco.com (aer-iport-3.cisco.com [173.38.203.53]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A04FF3A0C02 for <mud@ietf.org>; Wed, 8 Jul 2020 00:32:21 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=8059; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1594193541; x=1595403141; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc: to:references; bh=OcLuWLtj0KCOywAqtK4HB3hjVQToYE+S+pIaDr3y9rg=; b=EDxd0CdzPS8RYuQnlK/mgcWrilHht6vwlMM0WMIrbvwZiJ09/COrvrg4 Ji2flf5fol6tufDpbNW3G2hcY6wG26rLe//1su0LDZQuYoAJw7gRqRMz0 qFLvsFqyz23jDjcqtVIfFO0A6SNJCe0ddbJsUnpQMDfkEaqu1iI0UR9g0 I=;
X-IPAS-Result: A0BjAAAudgVf/xbLJq1gGgEBAQEBAQEBAQEDAQEBARIBAQEBAgIBAQEBggqBI4F2VAEgEiyEMokBiBeTb4gVCwEBAQwBARgBCgwEAQGERwKCEiU4EwIDAQEBAwIDAQEBAQUBAQECAQYEbYVbDIVuAQEBAQIBAQEhSwsFCwsYJwMCAicfEQYTG4MLAYJcIA+oRXaBMoVRhHsGgTiNBIIAgTgcgk0+glwBAYR1M4ItBI9FEolJm2uCZoMGlkQDHZEejX+saoNRAgQGBQIVgWoiKYEtMxoIGxU7KgGCPj4SGQ2SD4UUhUQ/AzANKgIGAQcBAQMJjhEtghcBAQ
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="5.75,327,1589241600"; d="scan'208,217"; a="25300884"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-2.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 08 Jul 2020 07:32:17 +0000
Received: from [10.61.221.181] ([10.61.221.181]) by aer-core-2.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 0687WGEG009423 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 8 Jul 2020 07:32:17 GMT
From: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
Message-Id: <92E46541-DDDD-48C1-A77D-02916579B314@cisco.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_C4081948-38C6-4B0D-99CB-2B5B930AE7CE"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.80.23.2.2\))
Date: Wed, 08 Jul 2020 09:32:16 +0200
In-Reply-To: <0cd51d5feda24d6897c78e8fa1589f42@checkpoint.com>
Cc: "mud@ietf.org" <mud@ietf.org>
To: Daniel Cohen-Sason <danielcoh@checkpoint.com>
References: <0cd51d5feda24d6897c78e8fa1589f42@checkpoint.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.80.23.2.2)
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 10.61.221.181, [10.61.221.181]
X-Outbound-Node: aer-core-2.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mud/awDQbxEQscWgm5jMDUcs0mO0P4o>
Subject: Re: [Mud] Updated Manufactures supporting MUD
X-BeenThere: mud@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of Manufacturer Ussage Descriptions <mud.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mud>, <mailto:mud-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mud/>
List-Post: <mailto:mud@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mud-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mud>, <mailto:mud-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Jul 2020 07:32:24 -0000

Hi Daniel,

There are a number of manufacturers that are in flight.  The code is supported by Microchip, and the capability is being introduced in Wifi Alliance’s DPP as well.  Molex supports.  If you don’t mind I will point your name to several companies under separate cover, and maybe one or two others who can add.

> On 8 Jul 2020, at 07:59, Daniel Cohen-Sason <danielcoh@checkpoint.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi
> I am Daniel, leading the R&D for Check Point’s IoT protection (https://www.checkpoint.com/solutions/iot-security/ <https://www.checkpoint.com/solutions/iot-security/>)
> I am considering to include some level of support in MUD with our products.
> I understand the technology, and as security vendor I understand what we need to do.
> I’d like to validate that this is something that the manufactures adopted already, and the trend.
> Can you share with me more information?
>  
> Regards,
> Daniel
> +972-53-5658548
>  
> -- 
> Mud mailing list
> Mud@ietf.org <mailto:Mud@ietf.org>
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mud <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mud>