[Mud] SBOMs and version non-specific MUD files

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Fri, 04 February 2022 17:40 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: mud@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mud@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FEED3A1CB4; Fri, 4 Feb 2022 09:40:02 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SsPMNTTmg84Y; Fri, 4 Feb 2022 09:39:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from relay.sandelman.ca (relay.cooperix.net [176.58.120.209]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0223A3A1CB5; Fri, 4 Feb 2022 09:39:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from dooku.sandelman.ca (unknown [142.169.78.77]) by relay.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 00CBB1F44B; Fri, 4 Feb 2022 17:39:54 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by dooku.sandelman.ca (Postfix, from userid 179) id 82FA81A03ED; Fri, 4 Feb 2022 12:39:53 -0500 (EST)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: mud@ietf.org
cc: opsawg@ietf.org
X-Attribution: mcr
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.7.1; GNU Emacs 26.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2022 12:39:53 -0500
Message-ID: <282926.1643996393@dooku>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mud/uj_cOBdXF9Ob86gaXzF2VHz2S8c>
Subject: [Mud] SBOMs and version non-specific MUD files
X-BeenThere: mud@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of Manufacturer Ussage Descriptions <mud.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mud>, <mailto:mud-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mud/>
List-Post: <mailto:mud@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mud-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mud>, <mailto:mud-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2022 17:40:02 -0000

ietf-opsawg-sbom-access provides for linking to an SBOM from a MUD file.

My understanding is that for the sbom-retrival-method==cloud, that
a list of sboms is included, one per version of the device firmware.

I just wanted to re-iterate that this really is a good thing, because it allows
for a version agnostic MUD file to list many things.

I would like a cloud example to be added.

I think that we need some RFC6125 text for the https: local-well-known text
to explain how validation is (not) done.

We still need some way to determine what version of firmware a device is
running, and while the correct answer is remote attestation, it would be
lovely if there was a recommendation for a lighter weight process.
LLDP regularly reveals this, but that's unlikely to work over wifi or in
residential situations.
(I acknowledge that this is out of scope for sbom-access)


--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works
 -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-