[multimob] [Errata Verified] RFC7161 (4146)

RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Thu, 20 November 2014 14:59 UTC

Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: multimob@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: multimob@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFB1F1A1A5B; Thu, 20 Nov 2014 06:59:05 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -107.496
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-107.496 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.594, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SmXuVe6jdVb6; Thu, 20 Nov 2014 06:59:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB05B1A1A10; Thu, 20 Nov 2014 06:59:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 0191D181C70; Thu, 20 Nov 2014 06:58:06 -0800 (PST)
To: sgundave@cisco.com, lmcm@tid.es, cjbc@it.uc3m.es, isoto@it.uc3m.es
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:errata_mail_lib.php
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Message-Id: <20141120145807.0191D181C70@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2014 06:58:06 -0800 (PST)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/multimob/O91iycvPCXv8yk33kTxNRqwLC1Y
Cc: multimob@ietf.org, iesg@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Subject: [multimob] [Errata Verified] RFC7161 (4146)
X-BeenThere: multimob@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multicast Mobility <multimob.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/multimob>, <mailto:multimob-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/multimob/>
List-Post: <mailto:multimob@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:multimob-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/multimob>, <mailto:multimob-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2014 14:59:06 -0000

The following errata report has been verified for RFC7161,
"Proxy Mobile IPv6 (PMIPv6) Multicast Handover Optimization by the Subscription Information Acquisition through the LMA (SIAL)". 

--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=7161&eid=4146

--------------------------------------
Status: Verified
Type: Technical

Reported by: Sri Gundavelli <sgundave@cisco.com>;
Date Reported: 2014-10-28
Verified by: Brian Haberman (IESG)

Section: 4.2.2.1

Original Text
-------------
4.2.2.1.  Proxy Binding Update Message

   As result of the new defined flag, the PBU message format is updated
   as follows:

      0                   1                   2                   3
      0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
                                     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
                                     |           Sequence #          |
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     |A|H|L|K|M|R|P|S|   Reserved    |            Lifetime           |
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     |                                                               |
     .                                                               .
     .                          Mobility Options                     .
     .                                                               .
     |                                                               |
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+



Corrected Text
--------------
4.2.2.1.  Proxy Binding Update Message

   As result of the new defined flag, the PBU message format is updated
   as follows:

      0                   1                   2                   3
      0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
                                     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
                                     |           Sequence #          |
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     |A|H|L|K|M|R|P|F|T|B|S| Reserved|            Lifetime           |
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     |                                                               |
     .                                                               .
     .                          Mobility Options                     .
     .                                                               .
     |                                                               |
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+





Notes
-----
There is a mistake in the flags portion of the PBU/PBA messages ?
It seems to be overlapping with flags defined in RFC5845. RFC5555. Both the specs were published many years before RFC7161. 

Binding Update Flags

Registration Procedure(s)
Standards Action or IESG Approval
Reference
[RFC5213]
Available Formats

CSV
Flag 	Value 	Reference 
A	0x8000	[RFC6275]
H	0x4000	[RFC6275]
L	0x2000	[RFC6275]
K	0x1000	[RFC6275]
M	0x0800	[RFC4140]
R	0x0400	[RFC3963]
P	0x0200	[RFC5213]
F	0x0100	[RFC5555]
T	0x0080	[RFC5845]
B	0x0040	[RFC6602]
S	0x0020	[RFC7161]


RFC 5845:


6.2.  Proxy Binding Update Message Extension

   This specification extends the Proxy Binding Update message as
   defined in [RFC5213] with the new TLV-header format (T) flag.  The
   new (T) flag is described below and shown as part of the Proxy
   Binding Update message as in Figure 3.

       0                   1                   2                   3
       0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
                                      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
                                      |          Sequence #           |
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      |A|H|L|K|M|R|P|F|T|  Reserved   |           Lifetime            |
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+



RFC 7161
4.2.2.1.  Proxy Binding Update Message

   As result of the new defined flag, the PBU message format is updated
   as follows:

      0                   1                   2                   3
      0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
                                     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
                                     |           Sequence #          |
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     |A|H|L|K|M|R|P|S|   Reserved    |            Lifetime           |
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     |                                                               |
     .                                                               .
     .                          Mobility Options                     .
     .                                                               .
     |                                                               |
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

--------------------------------------
RFC7161 (draft-ietf-multimob-handover-optimization-07)
--------------------------------------
Title               : Proxy Mobile IPv6 (PMIPv6) Multicast Handover Optimization by the Subscription Information Acquisition through the LMA (SIAL)
Publication Date    : March 2014
Author(s)           : LM. Contreras, CJ. Bernardos, I. Soto
Category            : EXPERIMENTAL
Source              : Multicast Mobility
Area                : Internet
Stream              : IETF
Verifying Party     : IESG