[multimob] [Errata Verified] RFC7161 (4146)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Thu, 20 November 2014 14:59 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: multimob@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: multimob@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFB1F1A1A5B; Thu, 20 Nov 2014 06:59:05 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -107.496
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-107.496 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.594, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SmXuVe6jdVb6; Thu, 20 Nov 2014 06:59:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB05B1A1A10; Thu, 20 Nov 2014 06:59:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 0191D181C70; Thu, 20 Nov 2014 06:58:06 -0800 (PST)
To: sgundave@cisco.com, lmcm@tid.es, cjbc@it.uc3m.es, isoto@it.uc3m.es
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:errata_mail_lib.php
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Message-Id: <20141120145807.0191D181C70@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2014 06:58:06 -0800
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/multimob/O91iycvPCXv8yk33kTxNRqwLC1Y
Cc: multimob@ietf.org, iesg@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Subject: [multimob] [Errata Verified] RFC7161 (4146)
X-BeenThere: multimob@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multicast Mobility <multimob.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/multimob>, <mailto:multimob-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/multimob/>
List-Post: <mailto:multimob@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:multimob-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/multimob>, <mailto:multimob-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2014 14:59:06 -0000
The following errata report has been verified for RFC7161, "Proxy Mobile IPv6 (PMIPv6) Multicast Handover Optimization by the Subscription Information Acquisition through the LMA (SIAL)". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=7161&eid=4146 -------------------------------------- Status: Verified Type: Technical Reported by: Sri Gundavelli <sgundave@cisco.com> Date Reported: 2014-10-28 Verified by: Brian Haberman (IESG) Section: 4.2.2.1 Original Text ------------- 4.2.2.1. Proxy Binding Update Message As result of the new defined flag, the PBU message format is updated as follows: 0 1 2 3 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Sequence # | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ |A|H|L|K|M|R|P|S| Reserved | Lifetime | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | | . . . Mobility Options . . . | | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ Corrected Text -------------- 4.2.2.1. Proxy Binding Update Message As result of the new defined flag, the PBU message format is updated as follows: 0 1 2 3 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Sequence # | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ |A|H|L|K|M|R|P|F|T|B|S| Reserved| Lifetime | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | | . . . Mobility Options . . . | | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ Notes ----- There is a mistake in the flags portion of the PBU/PBA messages ? It seems to be overlapping with flags defined in RFC5845. RFC5555. Both the specs were published many years before RFC7161. Binding Update Flags Registration Procedure(s) Standards Action or IESG Approval Reference [RFC5213] Available Formats CSV Flag Value Reference A 0x8000 [RFC6275] H 0x4000 [RFC6275] L 0x2000 [RFC6275] K 0x1000 [RFC6275] M 0x0800 [RFC4140] R 0x0400 [RFC3963] P 0x0200 [RFC5213] F 0x0100 [RFC5555] T 0x0080 [RFC5845] B 0x0040 [RFC6602] S 0x0020 [RFC7161] RFC 5845: 6.2. Proxy Binding Update Message Extension This specification extends the Proxy Binding Update message as defined in [RFC5213] with the new TLV-header format (T) flag. The new (T) flag is described below and shown as part of the Proxy Binding Update message as in Figure 3. 0 1 2 3 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Sequence # | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ |A|H|L|K|M|R|P|F|T| Reserved | Lifetime | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ RFC 7161 4.2.2.1. Proxy Binding Update Message As result of the new defined flag, the PBU message format is updated as follows: 0 1 2 3 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Sequence # | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ |A|H|L|K|M|R|P|S| Reserved | Lifetime | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | | . . . Mobility Options . . . | | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ -------------------------------------- RFC7161 (draft-ietf-multimob-handover-optimization-07) -------------------------------------- Title : Proxy Mobile IPv6 (PMIPv6) Multicast Handover Optimization by the Subscription Information Acquisition through the LMA (SIAL) Publication Date : March 2014 Author(s) : LM. Contreras, CJ. Bernardos, I. Soto Category : EXPERIMENTAL Source : Multicast Mobility Area : Internet Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [multimob] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7161 (4… RFC Errata System
- [multimob] [Errata Verified] RFC7161 (4146) RFC Errata System