IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [multimob] Polling WG on draft-ietf-multimob-pmipv6-source-07

Brian Haberman <brian@innovationslab.net> Fri, 10 January 2014 13:44 UTC

Return-Path: <brian@innovationslab.net>
X-Original-To: multimob@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: multimob@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 860181ADEBE for <multimob@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 10 Jan 2014 05:44:33 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fu7UlB0afa9j for <multimob@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 10 Jan 2014 05:44:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from uillean.fuaim.com (uillean.fuaim.com [206.197.161.140]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60A1A1ADE72 for <multimob@ietf.org>; Fri, 10 Jan 2014 05:44:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from clairseach.fuaim.com (clairseach-high.fuaim.com [206.197.161.158]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by uillean.fuaim.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8912E880A9 for <multimob@ietf.org>; Fri, 10 Jan 2014 05:44:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from 102524251.rudm1.ra.johnshopkins.edu (addr16212925014.ippl.jhmi.edu [162.129.250.14]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by clairseach.fuaim.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 511E0130003 for <multimob@ietf.org>; Fri, 10 Jan 2014 05:44:22 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <52CFF954.1070604@innovationslab.net>
Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2014 08:44:52 -0500
From: Brian Haberman <brian@innovationslab.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: multimob@ietf.org
References: <CAC8QAcdYk0dioXh7x3_Offq+2Ykg2OhS70Nw9j3TcdHjGg_v+A@mail.gmail.com> <52CF081A.9010608@informatik.haw-hamburg.de> <CAC8QAcctaN7m23iE9oW7NQpPbx3GQ6TF08e4ZVBuiXJZR4_Nbw@mail.gmail.com> <556a93ec289a22d237e5bddbfa0c3ded@posteo.de> <CAC8QAceSmWStkgitwCg4YhhfLVKu7jV9LMU9_x7bAZTwGLrbWg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAC8QAceSmWStkgitwCg4YhhfLVKu7jV9LMU9_x7bAZTwGLrbWg@mail.gmail.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="0wocTX4UeS6AKIaQBMwAi5HscW40XoGKU"
Subject: Re: [multimob] Polling WG on draft-ietf-multimob-pmipv6-source-07
X-BeenThere: multimob@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multicast Mobility <multimob.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/multimob>, <mailto:multimob-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/multimob/>
List-Post: <mailto:multimob@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:multimob-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/multimob>, <mailto:multimob-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2014 13:44:33 -0000

Behcet,

On 1/9/14 6:11 PM, Behcet Sarikaya wrote:
> Hello Sebastian,
> 
> If this protocol is implemented maybe we should go for standard track
> document.
> 
> What do you think?

Given the operational knowledge we have with this work, I don't think it
would be wise.  Experimental is still the most appropriate track at this
point.

Regards,
Brian

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email