Re: [multimob] Polling WG on draft-ietf-multimob-pmipv6-source-07

Sebastian Woelke <sebastian.woelke@posteo.de> Thu, 09 January 2014 21:58 UTC

Return-Path: <sebastian.woelke@posteo.de>
X-Original-To: multimob@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: multimob@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E3E91AE0C0 for <multimob@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Jan 2014 13:58:37 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.088
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.088 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.538] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9gde1um4B5UK for <multimob@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Jan 2014 13:58:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx02a.posteo.de (mx02a.posteo.de [89.146.194.168]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBEE11A1F1A for <multimob@ietf.org>; Thu, 9 Jan 2014 13:58:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id B62943034902 for <multimob@ietf.org>; Thu, 9 Jan 2014 21:58:23 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at posteo.de
Received: from posteo.de ([10.125.125.134]) by localhost (amavis1.posteo.de [10.125.125.165]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id 3UcoiIjBUQXT for <multimob@ietf.org>; Thu, 9 Jan 2014 22:58:19 +0100 (CET)
Received: from mail.posteo.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9573420420EF6 for <multimob@ietf.org>; Thu, 9 Jan 2014 22:58:19 +0100 (CET)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Thu, 09 Jan 2014 22:58:19 +0100
From: Sebastian Woelke <sebastian.woelke@posteo.de>
To: multimob@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <CAC8QAcctaN7m23iE9oW7NQpPbx3GQ6TF08e4ZVBuiXJZR4_Nbw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAC8QAcdYk0dioXh7x3_Offq+2Ykg2OhS70Nw9j3TcdHjGg_v+A@mail.gmail.com> <52CF081A.9010608@informatik.haw-hamburg.de> <CAC8QAcctaN7m23iE9oW7NQpPbx3GQ6TF08e4ZVBuiXJZR4_Nbw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <556a93ec289a22d237e5bddbfa0c3ded@posteo.de>
X-Sender: sebastian.woelke@posteo.de
User-Agent: Posteo Webmail
Subject: Re: [multimob] Polling WG on draft-ietf-multimob-pmipv6-source-07
X-BeenThere: multimob@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multicast Mobility <multimob.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/multimob>, <mailto:multimob-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/multimob/>
List-Post: <mailto:multimob@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:multimob-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/multimob>, <mailto:multimob-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Jan 2014 21:58:37 -0000

Hello,

I reviewed pmipv6-source-06 for the WG last call, I implemented parts 
of it and weeks after the last call I think the draft is still in a good 
shape and ready for the next step.
I also think the draft get a consistency problem if we remove this 
chapter.

Kind Regards,
Sebastian



Am 09.01.2014 21:51 schrieb Behcet Sarikaya:
> Hi Thomas,
> 
> On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 2:35 PM, Thomas C. Schmidt
> <schmidt@informatik.haw-hamburg.de> wrote:
> 
>> Hi,
>> 
>> I do not think that IETF procedures allow for WG chairs to garble 
>> drafts after they had successfully passed WG last call.
> 
> This is not garbling the draft.
> 
> Please refer to the shepherd document:
> 
> http://www.ietf.org/iesg/template/doc-writeup.html [6]
> 
> In order to answer positively many questions like 2, Working Group
> Summary, or 4,
> 
> We need to get WG's opinion.
> 
> I personally am confused.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Behcet
>  
> 
>> Am I mistaken, Brian?
>> 
>> Cheers,
>> 
>> Thomas
>> 
>> On 09.01.2014 21:12, Behcet Sarikaya wrote:
>> 
>>> Hi all,
>>> 
>>> Before shepherding this document to IESG we would like to get 
>>> consensus
>>> opinion on one issue regarding this document that came up recently.
>>> Please refer to my conversation with Thomas on the list.
>>> 
>>> ISSUE:
>>> Multimob WG has not worked on PIM at MAG for receiver mobility, we 
>>> only
>>> worked on Proxy at MAG as per RFC 6224.
>>> However draft-ietf-multimob-pmipv6-source-07 covers PIM at MAG for
>>> source mobility starting with Section 4.3.
>>> 
>>> Question:
>>> 
>>> Do you support covering PIM at MAG for source mobility, then say 
>>> YES,
>>> 
>>> if you do not support it then say NO.
>>> 
>>> We need as many people as possible to express opinion on this issue. 
>>> The
>>> deadline is one week from today, January 16, 2014.
>>> 
>>> If WG consensus does not exist, we will ask the authors to remove 
>>> PIM at
>>> MAG sections (subsections) and we will submit the revised document 
>>> to IESG.
>>> 
>>> Regards,
>>> 
>>> Behcet
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> multimob mailing list
>>> multimob@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/multimob [1]
>> 
>> --
>> 
>> Prof. Dr. Thomas C. Schmidt
>> ° Hamburg University of Applied Sciences                   Berliner 
>> Tor 7 °
>> ° Dept. Informatik, Internet Technologies Group    20099 Hamburg, 
>> Germany °
>> ° http://www.haw-hamburg.de/inet [2]                   Fon: 
>> +49-40-42875-8452 [3] °
>> ° http://www.informatik.haw-hamburg.de/~schmidt [4]    Fax: 
>> +49-40-42875-8409 [5] °
> 
> 
> 
> Links:
> ------
> [1] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/multimob
> [2] http://www.haw-hamburg.de/inet
> [3] tel:%2B49-40-42875-8452
> [4] http://www.informatik.haw-hamburg.de/~schmidt
> [5] tel:%2B49-40-42875-8409
> [6] http://www.ietf.org/iesg/template/doc-writeup.html
> 
> _______________________________________________
> multimob mailing list
> multimob@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/multimob