Re: [multipathtcp] Consensus call on potential MPTCP proxy work

Joe Touch <touch@isi.edu> Fri, 21 April 2017 16:07 UTC

Return-Path: <touch@isi.edu>
X-Original-To: multipathtcp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: multipathtcp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 117A0128B8F for <multipathtcp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 21 Apr 2017 09:07:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id U28eQn7S2uZ5 for <multipathtcp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 21 Apr 2017 09:07:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from vapor.isi.edu (vapor.isi.edu [128.9.64.64]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3560112778D for <multipathtcp@ietf.org>; Fri, 21 Apr 2017 09:07:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [128.9.184.96] ([128.9.184.96]) (authenticated bits=0) by vapor.isi.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id v3LG7LBj016809 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Fri, 21 Apr 2017 09:07:22 -0700 (PDT)
To: mohamed.boucadair@orange.com, Yoshifumi Nishida <nishida@sfc.wide.ad.jp>
Cc: multipathtcp <multipathtcp@ietf.org>
References: <8c5ffa879686472594bfd3db2fa06076@rew09926dag03b.domain1.systemhost.net> <99affa00-5118-1a0f-227a-b3f4b751ffd4@isi.edu> <CAO249ye4Yz2Fgf5=XG5F3JkODym1AXrZV3pXyVLgG-h2iVhLVw@mail.gmail.com> <8cd97018-1104-c647-45fc-9135097e7420@isi.edu> <CAO249ycQqVweB5TaQNa2s8uFvQhSQrESrNmF1+8a8_ZO+Yqkyg@mail.gmail.com> <8bef96b7-1b7d-94eb-2e59-7323c2a9b866@isi.edu> <787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B933009E503E2@OPEXCLILMA3.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> <7dca446a-e890-6d47-41d9-4f21100e551c@isi.edu> <787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B933009E50F66@OPEXCLILMA3.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> <e1a16d40-1a37-23d3-ceb7-580675184425@isi.edu> <787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B933009E5204E@OPEXCLILMA3.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
From: Joe Touch <touch@isi.edu>
Message-ID: <35c6bd09-c29f-2eb3-6c70-cb02163090aa@isi.edu>
Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2017 09:07:19 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B933009E5204E@OPEXCLILMA3.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------28C678AE7A6B007A3675E4E5"
Content-Language: en-US
X-ISI-4-43-8-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-From: touch@isi.edu
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/multipathtcp/60L_TRFFq_3xyFZtkTfsmal-oZM>
Subject: Re: [multipathtcp] Consensus call on potential MPTCP proxy work
X-BeenThere: multipathtcp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-path extensions for TCP <multipathtcp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/multipathtcp>, <mailto:multipathtcp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/multipathtcp/>
List-Post: <mailto:multipathtcp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:multipathtcp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/multipathtcp>, <mailto:multipathtcp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2017 16:07:45 -0000

One final point:


On 4/21/2017 5:27 AM, mohamed.boucadair@orange.com wrote:
>
> MPTCP archives are full of discussions on why the data plane is not a
> good place to put option information.
>
> [Med] Hmm, EDO does already that. But…more important:
>
It also explains at length why this is not possible inside the SYN.

Again, MPTCP isn't the place to develop solutions that have been
rejected within TCPM.

Joe