Re: [multipathtcp] Multipath TCP Address advertisement 5/5 - Communities

Fabien Duchêne <fabien.duchene@uclouvain.be> Mon, 14 November 2016 01:32 UTC

Return-Path: <fabien.duchene@uclouvain.be>
X-Original-To: multipathtcp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: multipathtcp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99D5F12960A for <multipathtcp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 13 Nov 2016 17:32:45 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.301
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.301 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=uclouvain.be
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sslOqxizN9UF for <multipathtcp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 13 Nov 2016 17:32:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp1.sgsi.ucl.ac.be (smtp.sgsi.ucl.ac.be [130.104.5.67]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3318E1295E5 for <multipathtcp@ietf.org>; Sun, 13 Nov 2016 17:32:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [31.133.134.81] (dhcp-8651.meeting.ietf.org [31.133.134.81]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: duchenef@smtp1.sgsi.ucl.ac.be) by smtp1.sgsi.ucl.ac.be (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5885B67DA07 for <multipathtcp@ietf.org>; Mon, 14 Nov 2016 02:32:34 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.9.2 smtp1.sgsi.ucl.ac.be 5885B67DA07
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=uclouvain.be; s=selucl; t=1479087155; bh=LWEWgm6tyqGrhKuGhUNJBjv16Xa4V/ZhM2ovkRjMsCg=; h=Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=wK72XQMW6/MJHQrxhhFEFgTPus8+ni7SkrmnoDYB4xsC8+7fMDBqqCU+opBzGEr+I 7JfT2rNT/pReEHCBd8THsoaaJ2Lojob4qlO8cjwbJGShD77ZL9NzWR2HolkEnixi3y QXWskP5a2Yx7AKnPilbVcYHVMvbNRG3yAer7f1WE=
X-Virus-Status: Clean
X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.99.2 at smtp-1
To: "multipathtcp@ietf.org" <multipathtcp@ietf.org>
References: <581F243E.2050900@uclouvain.be> <20161113075327.GI4269@Chimay.local>
From: =?UTF-8?Q?Fabien_Duch=c3=aane?= <fabien.duchene@uclouvain.be>
Message-ID: <30cb7e91-5c29-662b-c6d5-9701c75e95af@uclouvain.be>
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2016 02:32:29 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/45.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20161113075327.GI4269@Chimay.local>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Sgsi-Spamcheck: SASL authenticated,
X-SGSI-Information:
X-SGSI-MailScanner-ID: 5885B67DA07.A205A
X-SGSI-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-SGSI-From: fabien.duchene@uclouvain.be
X-SGSI-Spam-Status: No
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/multipathtcp/6cN26ek9QMLIAMOlHMZ_OA2197M>
Subject: Re: [multipathtcp] Multipath TCP Address advertisement 5/5 - Communities
X-BeenThere: multipathtcp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-path extensions for TCP <multipathtcp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/multipathtcp>, <mailto:multipathtcp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/multipathtcp/>
List-Post: <mailto:multipathtcp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:multipathtcp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/multipathtcp>, <mailto:multipathtcp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2016 01:32:45 -0000

Hello,


inline

On 11/13/2016 08:53 AM, Christoph Paasch wrote:
> I support this. Although, I wonder whether we need to use 4 bits. Maybe 3
> are enough? (just trying to spare a bit ;))
>
Hum, why not? I didn't really think about that while writing the draft, 
it was more "all your bits are belong to us" :D
8 values seems more than enough to me!

> Christoph
>
Fabien